» Articles » PMID: 27957537

Implantable Microcoils for Intracortical Magnetic Stimulation

Overview
Journal Sci Adv
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2016 Dec 14
PMID 27957537
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neural prostheses that stimulate the neocortex have the potential to treat a wide range of neurological disorders. However, the efficacy of electrode-based implants remains limited, with persistent challenges that include an inability to create precise patterns of neural activity as well as difficulties in maintaining response consistency over time. These problems arise from fundamental limitations of electrodes as well as their susceptibility to implantation and have proven difficult to overcome. Magnetic stimulation can address many of these limitations, but coils small enough to be implanted into the cortex were not thought strong enough to activate neurons. We describe a new microcoil design and demonstrate its effectiveness for both activating cortical neurons and driving behavioral responses. The stimulation of cortical pyramidal neurons in brain slices in vitro was reliable and could be confined to spatially narrow regions (<60 μm). The spatially asymmetric fields arising from the coil helped to avoid the simultaneous activation of passing axons. In vivo implantation was safe and resulted in consistent and predictable behavioral responses. The high permeability of magnetic fields to biological substances may yield another important advantage because it suggests that encapsulation and other adverse effects of implantation will not diminish coil performance over time, as happens to electrodes. These findings suggest that a coil-based implant might be a useful alternative to existing electrode-based devices. The enhanced selectivity of microcoil-based magnetic stimulation will be especially useful for visual prostheses as well as for many brain-computer interface applications that require precise activation of the cortex.

Citing Articles

Restore axonal conductance in a locally demyelinated axon with electromagnetic stimulation.

Ye H, Chen Y, Chen J, Hendee J J Neural Eng. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39904055 PMC: 11827109. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adb213.


Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.

Ge C, Masalehdan T, Shojaei Baghini M, Duran Toro V, Signorelli L, Thomson H Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(46):e2404254.

PMID: 39445520 PMC: 11633526. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202404254.


Transparent and Conformal Microcoil Arrays for Spatially Selective Neuronal Activation.

Raghuram V, Datye A, Fried S, Timko B Device. 2024; 2(4).

PMID: 39184953 PMC: 11343507. DOI: 10.1016/j.device.2024.100290.


Non-Invasive Brain Sensing Technologies for Modulation of Neurological Disorders.

Alfihed S, Majrashi M, Ansary M, Alshamrani N, Albrahim S, Alsolami A Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39056611 PMC: 11274405. DOI: 10.3390/bios14070335.


Nanoparticle-based optical interfaces for retinal neuromodulation: a review.

Stoddart P, Begeng J, Tong W, Ibbotson M, Kameneva T Front Cell Neurosci. 2024; 18:1360870.

PMID: 38572073 PMC: 10987880. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1360870.


References
1.
Diester I, Kaufman M, Mogri M, Pashaie R, Goo W, Yizhar O . An optogenetic toolbox designed for primates. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(3):387-97. PMC: 3150193. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2749. View

2.
Gustafsson B, Jankowska E . Direct and indirect activation of nerve cells by electrical pulses applied extracellularly. J Physiol. 1976; 258(1):33-61. PMC: 1308958. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011405. View

3.
Cogan S, Ludwig K, Welle C, Takmakov P . Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation. J Neural Eng. 2016; 13(2):021001. PMC: 5386002. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/021001. View

4.
Behrend M, Ahuja A, Humayun M, Chow R, Weiland J . Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011; 19(4):436-42. PMC: 3356684. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2140132. View

5.
Gilja V, Chestek C, Diester I, Henderson J, Deisseroth K, Shenoy K . Challenges and opportunities for next-generation intracortically based neural prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011; 58(7):1891-9. PMC: 3150197. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2107553. View