» Articles » PMID: 27908060

Individual Differences in the Perception of Regional, Nonnative, and Disordered Speech Varieties

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2016 Dec 3
PMID 27908060
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Speech perception abilities vary substantially across listeners, particularly in adverse conditions including those stemming from environmental degradation (e.g., noise) or from talker-related challenges (e.g., nonnative or disordered speech). This study examined adult listeners' recognition of words in phrases produced by six talkers representing three speech varieties: a nonnative accent (Spanish-accented English), a regional dialect (Irish English), and a disordered variety (ataxic dysarthria). Semantically anomalous phrases from these talkers were presented in a transcription task and intelligibility scores, percent words correct, were compared across the three speech varieties. Three cognitive-linguistic areas-receptive vocabulary, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control of attention-were assessed as possible predictors of individual word recognition performance. Intelligibility scores for the Spanish accent were significantly correlated with scores for the Irish English and ataxic dysarthria. Scores for the Irish English and dysarthric speech, in contrast, were not correlated. Furthermore, receptive vocabulary was the only cognitive-linguistic assessment that significantly predicted intelligibility scores. These results suggest that, rather than a global skill of perceiving speech that deviates from native dialect norms, listeners may possess specific abilities to overcome particular types of acoustic-phonetic deviation. Furthermore, vocabulary size offers performance benefits for intelligibility of speech that deviates from one's typical dialect norms.

Citing Articles

Individual Differences in the Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Speech: Associations With Neurocognitive Functions in Adult Cochlear Implant Users and With Noise-Vocoded Simulations.

Moberly A, Du L, Tamati T Trends Hear. 2025; 29:23312165241312449.

PMID: 39819389 PMC: 11742172. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241312449.


Increasing Motivation Increases Intelligibility Benefits of Perceptual Training in Dysarthria.

Borrie S, Tetzloff K, Barrett T, Lansford K Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024; 34(1):85-96.

PMID: 39504442 PMC: 11745309. DOI: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00196.


Implicit learning and individual differences in speech recognition: an exploratory study.

Khayr R, Karawani H, Banai K Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1238823.

PMID: 37744578 PMC: 10513179. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238823.


The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech.

Yoho S, Barrett T, Borrie S J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(10):4025-4036.

PMID: 37652059 PMC: 10713019. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00115.


Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories.

Drouin J, Rojas J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(8):2700-2717.

PMID: 37188863 PMC: 10185375. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02715-3.