» Articles » PMID: 32552477

Rapid Perceptual Learning: A Potential Source of Individual Differences in Speech Perception Under Adverse Conditions?

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2020 Jun 20
PMID 32552477
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Challenging listening situations (e.g., when speech is rapid or noisy) result in substantial individual differences in speech perception. We propose that rapid auditory perceptual learning is one of the factors contributing to those individual differences. To explore this proposal, we assessed rapid perceptual learning of time-compressed speech in young adults with normal hearing and in older adults with age-related hearing loss. We also assessed the contribution of this learning as well as that of hearing and cognition (vocabulary, working memory, and selective attention) to the recognition of natural-fast speech (NFS; both groups) and speech in noise (younger adults). In young adults, rapid learning and vocabulary were significant predictors of NFS and speech in noise recognition. In older adults, hearing thresholds, vocabulary, and rapid learning were significant predictors of NFS recognition. In both groups, models that included learning fitted the speech data better than models that did not include learning. Therefore, under adverse conditions, rapid learning may be one of the skills listeners could employ to support speech recognition.

Citing Articles

Linguistic feedback supports rapid adaptation to acoustically degraded speech.

Sun W, Zou J, Zhu T, Sun Z, Ding N iScience. 2024; 27(6):110055.

PMID: 38868204 PMC: 11167482. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110055.


Validation of two measures for assessing English vocabulary knowledge on web-based testing platforms: long-form assessments.

Drown L, Giovannone N, Pisoni D, Theodore R Linguist Vanguard. 2024; 9(1):113-124.

PMID: 38173913 PMC: 10758597. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2022-0115.


Validation of two measures for assessing English vocabulary knowledge on web-based testing platforms: brief assessments.

Drown L, Giovannone N, Pisoni D, Theodore R Linguist Vanguard. 2024; 9(1):99-111.

PMID: 38173912 PMC: 10758598. DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2022-0116.


Implicit learning and individual differences in speech recognition: an exploratory study.

Khayr R, Karawani H, Banai K Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1238823.

PMID: 37744578 PMC: 10513179. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238823.


The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech.

Yoho S, Barrett T, Borrie S J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(10):4025-4036.

PMID: 37652059 PMC: 10713019. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00115.


References
1.
Tierney A, Rosen S, Dick F . Speech-in-speech perception, nonverbal selective attention, and musical training. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019; 46(5):968-979. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000767. View

2.
Karawani H, Bitan T, Attias J, Banai K . Auditory Perceptual Learning in Adults with and without Age-Related Hearing Loss. Front Psychol. 2016; 6:2066. PMC: 4737899. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02066. View

3.
Adank P, Janse E . Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(5):2649-59. DOI: 10.1121/1.3216914. View

4.
Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons P . Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40(2):423-31. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4002.423. View

5.
Guediche S, Blumstein S, Fiez J, Holt L . Speech perception under adverse conditions: insights from behavioral, computational, and neuroscience research. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014; 7:126. PMC: 3879477. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00126. View