» Articles » PMID: 27891828

Reducing Calories, Fat, Saturated Fat, and Sodium in Restaurant Menu Items: Effects on Consumer Acceptance

Overview
Date 2016 Nov 29
PMID 27891828
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess consumer acceptance of reductions of calories, fat, saturated fat, and sodium to current restaurant recipes.

Methods: Twenty-four menu items, from six restaurant chains, were slightly modified and moderately modified by reducing targeted ingredients. Restaurant customers (n = 1,838) were recruited for a taste test and were blinded to the recipe version as well as the purpose of the study. Overall consumer acceptance was measured using a 9-point hedonic (like/dislike) scale, likelihood to purchase scale, Just-About-Right (JAR) 5-point scale, penalty analysis, and alienation analysis.

Results: Overall, modified recipes of 19 menu items were scored similar to (or better than) their respective current versions. Eleven menu items were found to be acceptable in the slightly modified recipe version, and eight menu items were found to be acceptable in the moderately modified recipe version. Acceptable ingredient modifications resulted in a reduction of up to 26% in calories and a reduction of up to 31% in sodium per serving.

Conclusions: The majority of restaurant menu items with small reductions of calories, fat, saturated fat, and sodium were acceptable. Given the frequency of eating foods away from home, these reductions could be effective in creating dietary improvements for restaurant diners.

Citing Articles

Total Fat and Fatty Acid Content in Meals Served by Independent Takeaway Outlets Participating in the Healthier Catering Commitment Initiative in London, UK.

Jaworowska A, Force S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39857574 PMC: 11764605. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010121.


Co-Designing Recipe Resources to Support Healthy Eating in African-Caribbeans in the United Kingdom: An Academic and Community Partnership Approach.

Apekey T, Moore S, Maynard M J Hum Nutr Diet. 2024; 38(1):e13412.

PMID: 39702935 PMC: 11659633. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13412.


Food environments in times of crises: Examining menu changes in response to COVID-19 among Hispanic Caribbean restaurants in New York City.

Frank T, Pouget E, Fuster M J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2024; 19(3):429-443.

PMID: 38947875 PMC: 11213553. DOI: 10.1080/19320248.2022.2118563.


The Quality of Menu Offerings in Independently Owned Restaurants in Baltimore, Maryland: Results from Mixed-Methods Formative Research for the FRESH Trial.

Hua S, Tucker A, Santos S, Thomas A, Mui Y, Velez-Burgess V Nutrients. 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38794762 PMC: 11123881. DOI: 10.3390/nu16101524.


Evaluating Microbiological Safety, Sensory Quality, and Packaging for Online Market Success of Roasted Pickled Fish Powder.

Aussanasuwannakul A, Butsuwan P Foods. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38540851 PMC: 10969797. DOI: 10.3390/foods13060861.


References
1.
Rolls B, Roe L, Meengs J . Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 83(1):11-7. PMC: 1474143. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/83.1.11. View

2.
Story M, Kaphingst K, Robinson-OBrien R, Glanz K . Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 29:253-72. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926. View

3.
Ogden C, Carroll M, Fryar C, Flegal K . Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011-2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015; (219):1-8. View

4.
Breck A, Cantor J, Martinez O, Elbel B . Who reports noticing and using calorie information posted on fast food restaurant menus?. Appetite. 2014; 81:30-6. PMC: 4127350. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.027. View

5.
Rolls B . The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav. 2009; 97(5):609-15. PMC: 4182946. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.011. View