» Articles » PMID: 27872074

Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms in Wounds

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Nov 23
PMID 27872074
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The persistent nature of chronic wounds leaves them highly susceptible to invasion by a variety of pathogens that have the ability to construct an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). This EPS makes the bacterial population, or biofilm, up to 1,000-fold more antibiotic tolerant than planktonic cells and makes wound healing extremely difficult. Thus, compounds which have the ability to degrade biofilms, but not host tissue components, are highly sought after for clinical applications. In this study, we examined the efficacy of two glycoside hydrolases, α-amylase and cellulase, which break down complex polysaccharides, to effectively disrupt Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa monoculture and coculture biofilms. We hypothesized that glycoside hydrolase therapy would significantly reduce EPS biomass and convert bacteria to their planktonic state, leaving them more susceptible to conventional antimicrobials. Treatment of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms, grown in vitro and in vivo, with solutions of α-amylase and cellulase resulted in significant reductions in biomass, dissolution of the biofilm, and an increase in the effectiveness of subsequent antibiotic treatments. These data suggest that glycoside hydrolase therapy represents a potential safe, effective, and new avenue of treatment for biofilm-related infections.

Citing Articles

Biofilm Dispersal and Wound Infection Clearance With Preclinical Debridement Agents.

Schneider R, Hamdan J, Rumbaugh K Int Wound J. 2025; 22(3):e70145.

PMID: 40069969 PMC: 11896880. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70145.


Non-disruptive matrix turnover is a conserved feature of biofilm aggregate growth in paradigm pathogenic species.

Reichhardt C, Matwichuk M, Lewerke L, Jacobs H, Yan J, Parsek M mBio. 2025; 16(3):e0393524.

PMID: 39982068 PMC: 11898600. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03935-24.


Structural characteristics, functions, and counteracting strategies of biofilms in .

Xia Y, Hu Z, Jin Q, Chen Q, Zhao C, Qiang R Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025; 27:488-500.

PMID: 39916696 PMC: 11799891. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.01.021.


Evaluation of Cinnamon Essential Oil and Its Emulsion on Biofilm-Associated Components of Clinical Strains.

Ganic T, Pecinar I, Nikolic B, Kekic D, Tomic N, Cvetkovic S Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39858391 PMC: 11761628. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14010106.


Magnetic Field/Ultrasound-Responsive FeO Microbubbles for Targeted Mechanical/Catalytic Removal of Bacterial Biofilms.

Lu L, Liu Y, Chen X, Xu F, Zhang Q, Yin Z Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39591070 PMC: 11597660. DOI: 10.3390/nano14221830.


References
1.
Watters C, DeLeon K, Trivedi U, Griswold J, Lyte M, Hampel K . Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms perturb wound resolution and antibiotic tolerance in diabetic mice. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2012; 202(2):131-41. PMC: 3567255. DOI: 10.1007/s00430-012-0277-7. View

2.
Baker P, Hill P, Snarr B, Alnabelseya N, Pestrak M, Lee M . Exopolysaccharide biosynthetic glycoside hydrolases can be utilized to disrupt and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Sci Adv. 2016; 2(5):e1501632. PMC: 4928890. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501632. View

3.
Gawande P, Clinton A, LoVetri K, Yakandawala N, Rumbaugh K, Madhyastha S . Antibiofilm Efficacy of DispersinB(®) Wound Spray Used in Combination with a Silver Wound Dressing. Microbiol Insights. 2014; 7:9-13. PMC: 4019235. DOI: 10.4137/MBI.S13914. View

4.
Allen P, WHELAN W . The mechanism of carbohydrase action. 9. Hydrolysis of salep mannan by preparations of alpha-amylase. Biochem J. 1963; 88:69-70. PMC: 1203849. DOI: 10.1042/bj0880069. View

5.
Gjodsbol K, Christensen J, Karlsmark T, Jorgensen B, Klein B, Krogfelt K . Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. Int Wound J. 2006; 3(3):225-31. PMC: 7951738. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00159.x. View