» Articles » PMID: 27867524

Varying Effects of Recommended Treatments for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the ESC and ACCF/AHA Guidelines

Overview
Journal ESC Heart Fail
Date 2016 Nov 22
PMID 27867524
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the treatment effects of recommended drugs and devices on key clinical outcomes for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) listed in the 2012 HF guideline from the European Society of Cardiology as well as the 2013 HF guideline from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association were evaluated for use in the meta-analysis. RCTs written in English evaluating recommended drugs and devices for the treatment of patients with HFREF were included. Meta-analyses, based on the outcomes of all-cause mortality and hospitalization because of HF, were performed with relative risk ratio as the effect size. In the identified 47 RCTs, patients were on average 63 years old and 22% were female. Drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, beta-blockers, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and intracardiac defibrillator devices (ICDs) significantly reduced the risk of death with reductions of 14-19, 23, 20, and 20%, respectively. Drugs targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, beta-blockers, digoxin, and CRT significantly reduced the risk of HF hospitalization with reductions of 24-37, 22, 60, and 36%, respectively, while ICDs significantly increased the risk with 34%. Ivabradine showed no significant effects on either outcome. As such, the majority of recommended HFREF treatments offered significant treatment benefits. However, many of the included studies were from the 1990s or earlier, and one must therefore be cautious when extrapolating these results to contemporary patients with HF.

Citing Articles

Optimal effectiveness of heart failure management - an umbrella review of meta-analyses examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce (re)hospitalizations in heart failure.

Hafkamp F, Tio R, Otterspoor L, de Greef T, van Steenbergen G, van de Ven A Heart Fail Rev. 2022; 27(5):1683-1748.

PMID: 35239106 PMC: 8892116. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-021-10212-8.


Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure.

Benstoem C, Kalvelage C, Breuer T, Heussen N, Marx G, Stoppe C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 11:CD013004.

PMID: 33147368 PMC: 8094176. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013004.pub2.


High-dose versus low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Migliavaca C, Stein C, Colpani V, Eibel B, Bgeginski R, Simoes M Open Heart. 2020; 7(2).

PMID: 32820054 PMC: 7443275. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001228.


Molecular, Cellular, and Clinical Evidence That Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Act as Neurohormonal Antagonists When Used for the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure.

Packer M J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(16):e016270.

PMID: 32791029 PMC: 7660825. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016270.


The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.

Anker M, Hadzibegovic S, Lena A, Haverkamp W ESC Heart Fail. 2019; 6(6):1291-1312.

PMID: 31886636 PMC: 6989289. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12583.


References
1.
Crozier I, Ikram H, Awan N, Cleland J, Stephen N, Dickstein K . Losartan in heart failure. Hemodynamic effects and tolerability. Losartan Hemodynamic Study Group. Circulation. 1995; 91(3):691-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.3.691. View

2.
Fox K, Komajda M, Ford I, Robertson M, Bohm M, Borer J . Effect of ivabradine in patients with left-ventricular systolic dysfunction: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the BEAUTIFUL and SHIFT trials. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(29):2263-70. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht101. View

3.
Wever E, Hauer R, van Capelle F, Tijssen J, Crijns H, Algra A . Randomized study of implantable defibrillator as first-choice therapy versus conventional strategy in postinfarct sudden death survivors. Circulation. 1995; 91(8):2195-203. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.8.2195. View

4.
Hood Jr W, Dans A, Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, McMurray J . Digitalis for treatment of congestive heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Fail. 2004; 10(2):155-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2003.12.005. View

5.
. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987; 316(23):1429-35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162301. View