» Articles » PMID: 27866066

Terminate Lung Cancer (TLC) Study-A Mixed-methods Population Approach to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness and Low-dose Computed Tomography in Eastern Kentucky

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Oncology
Public Health
Date 2016 Nov 21
PMID 27866066
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For low dose CT lung cancer screening to be effective in curbing disease mortality, efforts are needed to overcome barriers to awareness and facilitate uptake of the current evidence-based screening guidelines. A sequential mixed-methods approach was employed to design a screening campaign utilizing messages developed from community focus groups, followed by implementation of the outreach campaign intervention in two high-risk Kentucky regions. This study reports on rates of awareness and screening in intervention regions, as compared to a control region.

Citing Articles

A new communication approach to encourage lung cancer screening action in rural eligible populations.

Boatman D, McCauley-Hixenbaugh L, Starkey A, Allen A, Kennedy-Rea S PEC Innov. 2024; 4:100298.

PMID: 38962501 PMC: 11219952. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100298.


Review of Interventions That Improve Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: A Cataloging of Strategies That Have Been Shown to Work (or Not).

Nunez E, Ito Fukunaga M, Stevens G, Yang J, Reid S, Spiegel J Chest. 2024; 166(3):632-648.

PMID: 38797278 PMC: 11904607. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.019.


Cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.

Hudson L, Burus T, Park L, Huang B, Hull P, Vanderford N J Rural Health. 2023; 40(1):87-95.

PMID: 37095596 PMC: 10593907. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12763.


Using User-Centered Design to Facilitate Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study for Intervention Development.

Hirsch E, Studts J JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e46657.

PMID: 37058339 PMC: 10162485. DOI: 10.2196/46657.


Interventions Designed to Increase the Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening: An Equity-Oriented Scoping Review.

Sayani A, Ali M, Dey P, Corrado A, Ziegler C, Nicholson E JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023; 4(3):100469.

PMID: 36938372 PMC: 10015251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100469.


References
1.
Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S, Young T, Louw Q, Ochodo E . Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016; 28(1):122-8. PMC: 4767049. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv115. View

2.
Tanner N, Silvestri G . Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: benefits and potential risks. Evid Based Med. 2012; 18(3):108-9. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2012-100926. View

3.
Pineiro B, Simmons V, Palmer A, Correa J, Brandon T . Smoking cessation interventions within the context of Low-Dose Computed Tomography lung cancer screening: A systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2016; 98:91-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.028. View

4.
Cardarelli R, Roper K, Cardarelli K, Feltner F, Prater S, Ledford K . Identifying Community Perspectives for a Lung Cancer Screening Awareness Campaign in Appalachia Kentucky: The Terminate Lung Cancer (TLC) Study. J Cancer Educ. 2015; 32(1):125-134. PMC: 5569580. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0914-0. View

5.
Slatore C, Baumann C, Pappas M, Humphrey L . Smoking behaviors among patients receiving computed tomography for lung cancer screening. Systematic review in support of the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014; 11(4):619-27. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201312-460OC. View