» Articles » PMID: 27848064

The Carbon Footprints of Home and In-center Peritoneal Dialysis in China

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2016 Nov 17
PMID 27848064
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The provision of healthcare itself is associated with abundant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study aims to determine the carbon footprints of peritoneal dialysis (PD) with the different modalities and treatment regimes.

Methods: A total of 68 subjects performed with PD treatment were enrolled in this study. Emissions factors were applied to data that were collected for energy consumption, travel, and procurement.

Results: The carbon footprints generated by the provision of PD treatment for the individual patient were calculated and normalized to a 2-l PD dialysate volume. The fixed emissions were higher in patients who received PD therapy in center than at home, mostly attributing to the consumption of electricity. Conversely, PD treatment performed in center yielded less variable emissions than that of at home, which resulted from reduced constituent percentage of waste disposal and transportation. Collectively, packaging consumption mostly contributed to the total carbon footprints of PD.

Conclusion: This study for the first time demonstrates the delivery of PD is associated with considerable GHG emissions, which is mainly attributed to packaging materials, transportation, electricity, and waste disposal. These results suggest that carbon reduction strategies focusing on packaging consumption in PD treatment are likely to yield the greatest benefits.

Citing Articles

Impact of operating room waste in a high-volume institution and strategies for reduction: results from the CARING NATURE project.

Lorenzon L, Magalini S, Antolino L, De Rubeis G, Ferri L, Galati C Br J Surg. 2025; 112(2).

PMID: 39960151 PMC: 11831365. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf027.


How to improve the environmental impact in haemodialysis: small actions, big changes.

Jimenez M, Audije-Gil J, Martinez R, Martin Vaquero N, Gomez M, Portillo J Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(2):sfae407.

PMID: 39927256 PMC: 11806634. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae407.


The Carbon Footprint of Hospital Services and Care Pathways: A State-of-the-Science Review.

Kouwenberg L, Cohen E, Hehenkamp W, Snijder L, Kampman J, Kucukkeles B Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(12):126002.

PMID: 39729358 PMC: 11675664. DOI: 10.1289/EHP14754.


Possible benefits for environmental sustainability of combined therapy with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Japan.

Nagai K Front Nephrol. 2024; 4:1394200.

PMID: 39610671 PMC: 11602459. DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1394200.


Decarbonisation of Kidney Care in the United Arab Emirates: A Roadmap to an Environmentally Sustainable Care.

Holt S, Koornneef E, Al Obeidli A, Hubbert L, Nicholson L Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2024; 17:241-253.

PMID: 39430398 PMC: 11490247. DOI: 10.2147/IJNRD.S481121.


References
1.
Berger A, Edelsberg J, Inglese G, Bhattacharyya S, Oster G . Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15(8):509-18. View

2.
Lee B, Ellenbecker M, Moure-Eraso R . Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Manag. 2002; 22(5):461-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0956-053x(02)00006-5. View

3.
Morris D, Wright T, Somner J, Connor A . The carbon footprint of cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27(4):495-501. PMC: 3626018. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.9. View

4.
Kam-Tao Li P, Chow K . Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013; 62(5):993-1005. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.038. View

5.
Agar J . It is time for "green dialysis". Hemodial Int. 2013; 17(4):474-8. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12063. View