» Articles » PMID: 27847584

Character Decomposition and Transposition of Chinese Compound Words in the Right and Left Visual Fields

Overview
Journal Iperception
Date 2016 Nov 17
PMID 27847584
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the character decomposition and transposition processes of Chinese two-character compound words (canonical and transposed words) and pseudowords in the right and left visual fields using a dual-target rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. The results confirmed a right visual field superiority for canonical words, but this advantage vanished for transposed words. The findings further indicated that the same quality of lexical processing could be obtained from the foveal and parafoveal regions of the right and left visual fields, regardless of the character order, but not in the periphery of the right visual field. Moreover, the proportion of order reversals peaked at the central position and the shortest exposure time, but it declined with increasing eccentricity and time interval. We concluded that the character transposition of Chinese compound words was significantly sensitive in the periphery of the right visual field. Furthermore, the character order errors were mainly encoded in the foveal vision with a duration of 100 ms, which suggested that the order of the foveally presented Chinese characters was more likely to be reversed at the early stage of visual word processing.

Citing Articles

Electrophysiological Correlates of Character Transposition in the Left and Right Visual Fields.

Zhang E, Lai X, Li D, Lei V, Chen Y, Cao H Front Psychol. 2021; 12:684849.

PMID: 34421735 PMC: 8371268. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684849.


Character Decomposition and Transposition Processes of Chinese Compound Words in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.

Cao H, Yang K, Yan H Front Psychol. 2017; 8:483.

PMID: 28408895 PMC: 5374193. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00483.

References
1.
Cao H, Gao M, Yan H . Character Decomposition and Transposition Processes in Chinese Compound Words Modulates Attentional Blink. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:923. PMC: 4913106. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00923. View

2.
Bryden M, Rainey C . LEFT-RIGHT DIFFERENCES IN TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION. J Exp Psychol. 1963; 66:568-71. DOI: 10.1037/h0048905. View

3.
Ellis A . Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation. Brain Lang. 2004; 88(3):355-66. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4. View

4.
Lee H, Legge G, Ortiz A . Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision?. Vision Res. 2003; 43(26):2837-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00479-6. View

5.
Schuster S, Hawelka S, Hutzler F, Kronbichler M, Richlan F . Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 26(10):3889-3904. PMC: 5028003. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw184. View