Chen L, Perfetti C, Xu Y
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024; 54(1):1.
PMID: 39644378
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-024-10117-1.
Wang D, Niu D, Li T, Gao X
Brain Sci. 2024; 14(10).
PMID: 39451978
PMC: 11505889.
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14100964.
Chang M, Pu Z, Wang J
PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18307.
PMID: 39430560
PMC: 11491060.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18307.
Chang M, Zhang K, Sun Y, Li S, Wang J
Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1136488.
PMID: 37457059
PMC: 10342199.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136488.
Feng L, Jiang N
Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1134229.
PMID: 37034915
PMC: 10074488.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134229.
Word's Predictability Can Modulate Semantic Preview Effect in High-Constraint Sentences.
Xu L, Liu S, Wang S, Sun D, Li N
Front Psychol. 2022; 13:849351.
PMID: 35401306
PMC: 8984147.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849351.
Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
Brothers T, Kuperberg G
J Mem Lang. 2020; 116.
PMID: 33100508
PMC: 7584137.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104174.
Word's Contextual Predictability and Its Character Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.
Liu Z, Liu X, Tong W, Fu F
Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1833.
PMID: 32982821
PMC: 7480120.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01833.
A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.
Zhao S, Li L, Chang M, Wang J, Paterson K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020; 74(1):68-76.
PMID: 32749198
PMC: 7745612.
DOI: 10.1177/1747021820951131.
Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
Albrengues C, Lavigne F, Aguilar C, Castet E, Vitu F
PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219666.
PMID: 31329614
PMC: 6645505.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219666.
Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.
Zang C, Du H, Bai X, Yan G, Liversedge S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019; 46(4):603-620.
PMID: 31246059
PMC: 7115127.
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000738.
Is the eye-movement field confused about fixations and saccades? A survey among 124 researchers.
Hessels R, Niehorster D, Nystrom M, Andersson R, Hooge I
R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(8):180502.
PMID: 30225041
PMC: 6124022.
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180502.
Word predictability affects saccade length in Chinese reading: An evaluation of the dynamic-adjustment model.
Liu Y, Guo S, Yu L, Reichle E
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(5):1891-1899.
PMID: 28762028
PMC: 5792377.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1357-x.
The Word Frequency Effect on Saccade Targeting during Chinese Reading: Evidence from a Survival Analysis of Saccade Length.
Liu Y, Huang R, Li Y, Gao D
Front Psychol. 2017; 8:116.
PMID: 28220094
PMC: 5292409.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00116.
Character-complexity effects in Chinese reading and visual search: A comparison and theoretical implications.
Yu L, Zhang Q, Priest C, Reichle E, Sheridan H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016; :1-12.
PMID: 27973992
PMC: 6139069.
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1272616.
Character Decomposition and Transposition of Chinese Compound Words in the Right and Left Visual Fields.
Cao H, Yang K, Yan H
Iperception. 2016; 7(6):2041669516675366.
PMID: 27847584
PMC: 5098684.
DOI: 10.1177/2041669516675366.
Saccade target selection in Chinese reading.
Li X, Liu P, Rayner K
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014; 22(2):524-30.
PMID: 25056006
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0693-3.
Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.
Ma G, Li X, Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014; 40(3):1046-59.
PMID: 24417292
PMC: 4214861.
DOI: 10.1037/a0035389.
Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: a systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading.
Li X, Bicknell K, Liu P, Wei W, Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013; 143(2):895-913.
PMID: 23834023
PMC: 3885613.
DOI: 10.1037/a0033580.
Predicting raters' transparency judgments of English and Chinese morphological constituents using latent semantic analysis.
Wang H, Hsu L, Tien Y, Pomplun M
Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(1):284-306.
PMID: 23784009
PMC: 3841261.
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0360-z.