» Articles » PMID: 27846799

From Yeast to Hypha: Defining Transcriptomic Signatures of the Morphological Switch in the Dimorphic Fungal Pathogen Ophiostoma Novo-ulmi

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Nov 17
PMID 27846799
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Yeast-to-hypha transition is a major morphological change in fungi. Molecular regulators and pathways that are involved in this process have been extensively studied in model species, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Mitogen-Actived Protein Kinase (MAPK) cascade, for example, is known to be involved in the yeast-to-pseudohypha switch. Yet the conservation of mechanisms regulating such morphological changes in non-model fungi is still poorly understood. Here, we investigate cell remodeling and transcriptomic modifications that occur during this morphological switch in the highly aggressive ascomycete fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi, the causal agent of Dutch elm disease.

Results: Using a combination of light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry, we demonstrate that the morphological switch occurs in less than 27 h, with phenotypic cell modifications being detected within the first 4 h. Using RNAseq, we found that over 22% of the genome of O. novo-ulmi is differentially expressed during the transition. By performing clustering analyses of time series gene expression data, we identified several sets of genes that are differentially expressed according to distinct and representative temporal profiles. Further, we found that several genes that are homologous to S. cerevisiae MAPK genes are regulated during the yeast-to-hypha transition in O. novo-ulmi and mostly over-expressed, suggesting convergence in gene expression regulation.

Conclusions: Our results are the first report of a time-course experiment monitoring the morphological transition in a non-model Sordariomycota species and reveal many genes of interest for further functional investigations of fungal dimorphism.

Citing Articles

Use of chitin:DNA ratio to assess growth form in fungal cells.

Kovacs-Simon A, Fones H BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):10.

PMID: 38233847 PMC: 10795418. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-01815-2.


Unraveling the transcriptional features and gene expression networks of pathogenic and saprotrophic species during the infection of .

de Oliveira T, Freyria N, Sarmiento-Villamil J, Porth I, Tanguay P, Bernier L Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(2):e0369423.

PMID: 38230934 PMC: 10845970. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03694-23.


Complexities underlying the breeding and deployment of Dutch elm disease resistant elms.

Martin J, Dominguez J, Solla A, Brasier C, Webber J, Santini A New For (Dordr). 2023; 54(4):661-696.

PMID: 37361260 PMC: 10287581. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-021-09865-y.


Independent Evolution Has Led to Distinct Genomic Signatures in Dutch Elm Disease-Causing Fungi and Other Vascular Wilts-Causing Fungal Pathogens.

Fijarczyk A, Bernier L, Sakalidis M, Medina-Mora C, Porth I J Fungi (Basel). 2023; 9(1).

PMID: 36675823 PMC: 9864908. DOI: 10.3390/jof9010002.


Comparative Analysis of Transcriptomes of ssp. Colonizing Resistant or Sensitive Genotypes of American Elm.

Nigg M, de Oliveira T, Sarmiento-Villamil J, de la Bastide P, Hintz W, Sherif S J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(6).

PMID: 35736120 PMC: 9224576. DOI: 10.3390/jof8060637.


References
1.
Yang E, Chow W, Wang G, Woo P, Lau S, Yuen K . Signature gene expression reveals novel clues to the molecular mechanisms of dimorphic transition in Penicillium marneffei. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(10):e1004662. PMC: 4199489. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004662. View

2.
Whiston E, Wise H, Sharpton T, Jui G, Cole G, Taylor J . Comparative transcriptomics of the saprobic and parasitic growth phases in Coccidioides spp. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e41034. PMC: 3401177. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041034. View

3.
Boyce K, Chang H, DSouza C, Kronstad J . An Ustilago maydis septin is required for filamentous growth in culture and for full symptom development on maize. Eukaryot Cell. 2005; 4(12):2044-56. PMC: 1317501. DOI: 10.1128/EC.4.12.2044-2056.2005. View

4.
Kuchin S, Vyas V, Carlson M . Snf1 protein kinase and the repressors Nrg1 and Nrg2 regulate FLO11, haploid invasive growth, and diploid pseudohyphal differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22(12):3994-4000. PMC: 133850. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.12.3994-4000.2002. View

5.
Robinson M, McCarthy D, Smyth G . edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(1):139-40. PMC: 2796818. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. View