» Articles » PMID: 27806906

Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study

Overview
Journal J Am Coll Surg
Date 2016 Nov 4
PMID 27806906
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although >40% of new breast cancer diagnoses in the US are in older women, few studies have assessed the outcomes of post-mastectomy reconstruction in this population. Our objective was to evaluate age effects on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes in women undergoing breast reconstruction, and to investigate whether age effects differ between reconstructive procedure types.

Study Design: Eligible patients in the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study from 11 institutions (57 providers) in North America were analyzed. Two-year complications and patient-reported outcomes via BREAST-Q domains were compared across younger (younger than 45 years), middle-aged (45 to 60 years), and older (older than 60 years) women. Mixed-effects regression models were used, controlling for a range of demographic and clinical covariates.

Results: A total of 1,531 patients were studied: 494 younger, 803 middle-aged, and 234 older. Age was not a significant predictor of complications. For sexual well-being 2 years post-reconstruction, older women reported 4.25 (p = 0.04) higher mean scores with implant procedures, and 10.39 (p < 0.01) higher mean scores with autologous procedures compared with younger women. No age effect was seen with implant procedures with regard to physical and psychosocial well-being; however, older women who underwent autologous procedures reported 6.07 (p < 0.01) higher physical, and 8.21 (p < 0.01) higher psychosocial well-being scores than younger women.

Conclusions: Age did not significantly affect complication rates. Older women demonstrated higher sexual well-being for both procedures, and better satisfaction and physical and psychosocial well-being than younger women with autologous procedures. Post-mastectomy reconstruction is a viable option for older patients, with risks and benefits comparable with those in younger women.

Citing Articles

Patient-reported outcomes 3 and 18 months after mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.

Harvey K, Johnson L, Sinai P, Mills N, White P, Holcombe C Br J Surg. 2025; 112(2).

PMID: 39996483 PMC: 11851068. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf032.


Normative BREAST-Q Scores in Sub-Saharan African Women: Interpreting the Impact of Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Baglien B, Kumar N, Kennedy S, Bekele M, Hoyte-Williams P, Ezeome E Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13(2):e6495.

PMID: 39974770 PMC: 11838158. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006495.


Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

Rocco N, Catanuto G, Accardo G, Velotti N, Chiodini P, Cinquini M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 10:CD013821.

PMID: 39479986 PMC: 11526434. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2.


Non-linear relationship between TyG index and the risk of prediabetes in young people: a 5-year retrospective cohort study in Chinese young adults.

Xiao J, Zhou L, Luo C, Han Y, Huang Z Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1414402.

PMID: 39220362 PMC: 11361993. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1414402.


Breast cancer patients' postoperative outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement: a single center experience.

De Luca A, Amabile M, Frusone F, Tripodi D, Costanzo M, La Torre G Gland Surg. 2024; 13(7):1164-1177.

PMID: 39175697 PMC: 11336787. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-58.


References
1.
Jeevan R, Mennie J, Mohanna P, ODonoghue J, Rainsbury R, Cromwell D . National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg. 2016; 103(9):1147-56. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10161. View

2.
Walton L, Ommen K, Audisio R . Breast reconstruction in elderly women breast cancer: a review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011; 37(5):353-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.02.001. View

3.
Girotto J, Schreiber J, Nahabedian M . Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life. Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 50(6):572-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000069064.68579.19. View

4.
Morrow M, Scott S, Menck H, Mustoe T, WINCHESTER D . Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 192(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00747-x. View

5.
Wong S, Freedman R, Sagara Y, Aydogan F, Barry W, Golshan M . Growing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Despite no Improvement in Long-term Survival for Invasive Breast Cancer. Ann Surg. 2017; 265(3):581-589. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698. View