» Articles » PMID: 37727338

A Clinical Practice Review on Process Efficiency in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Gland Surg
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2023 Sep 20
PMID 37727338
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Autologous breast reconstruction is considered the gold standard technique for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Thanks to recent refinements the main focus of surgery has shifted from flaps survival and donor site morbidity to optimal aesthetic outcomes and patients' satisfaction. However, prolonged operative time remains a limiting aspect for many patients and surgeons who aim in improving access to care and outcomes. Process mapping is a quality improvement strategy consisting of the creation of a visual representation of a process to recognize errors, minimize waste and optimize outcomes. It has been effectively applied in abdominal based autologous breast reconstruction in nine papers. The process segments and analysis varied between published papers, but all authors focused on intraoperative process mapping and reported reduced operative times. Additional preoperative and postoperative factors have been studied and are commonly applied to further optimize efficiency (such as preoperative CTA, co-surgery model, flap perfusion evaluation, postoperative monitoring, and ERAS protocol). Although shorter operative times are related to decrease surgical morbidity and faster recovery time, and safety, the aesthetic outcome should remain the main focus in autologous breast reconstruction. In fact, the true ultimate aim should be the achievement of high patient satisfaction.

References
1.
Marsh D, Patel N, Rozen W, Chowdhry M, Sharma H, Ramakrishnan V . Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency. Gland Surg. 2016; 5(2):107-14. PMC: 4791348. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.07.04. View

2.
Haddock N, Teotia S . Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap: Initial Experience with Simultaneous Bilateral Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8(5):e2800. PMC: 7605872. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002800. View

3.
Haddock N, Teotia S . Deconstructing the Reconstruction: Evaluation of Process and Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145(4):717e-724e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006630. View

4.
Fogarty B, Khan K, Ashall G, Leonard A . Complications of long operations: a prospective study of morbidity associated with prolonged operative time (> 6 h). Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52(1):33-6. DOI: 10.1054/bjps.1998.3019. View

5.
McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne D . Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 67(3):267-77. PMC: 3969247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. View