» Articles » PMID: 27792738

Rescaling of Spatio-Temporal Sensing in Eukaryotic Chemotaxis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Oct 30
PMID 27792738
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eukaryotic cells respond to a chemoattractant gradient by forming intracellular gradients of signaling molecules that reflect the extracellular chemical gradient-an ability called directional sensing. Quantitative experiments have revealed two characteristic input-output relations of the system: First, in a static chemoattractant gradient, the shapes of the intracellular gradients of the signaling molecules are determined by the relative steepness, rather than the absolute concentration, of the chemoattractant gradient along the cell body. Second, upon a spatially homogeneous temporal increase in the input stimulus, the intracellular signaling molecules are transiently activated such that the response magnitudes are dependent on fold changes of the stimulus, not on absolute levels. However, the underlying mechanism that endows the system with these response properties remains elusive. Here, by adopting a widely used modeling framework of directional sensing, local excitation and global inhibition (LEGI), we propose a hypothesis that the two rescaling behaviors stem from a single design principle, namely, invariance of the governing equations to a scale transformation of the input level. Analyses of the LEGI-based model reveal that the invariance can be divided into two parts, each of which is responsible for the respective response properties. Our hypothesis leads to an experimentally testable prediction that a system with the invariance detects relative steepness even in dynamic gradient stimuli as well as in static gradients. Furthermore, we show that the relation between the response properties and the scale invariance is general in that it can be implemented by models with different network topologies.

Citing Articles

Combined response of polar magnetotaxis to oxygen and pH: Insights from hanging drop assays and microcosm experiments.

Mao X, Egli R, Petersen N, Liu X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27331.

PMID: 39521854 PMC: 11550849. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78946-7.


Optimal inference of molecular interaction dynamics in FRET microscopy.

Kamino K, Kadakia N, Avgidis F, Liu Z, Aoki K, Shimizu T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(15):e2211807120.

PMID: 37014867 PMC: 10104582. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211807120.


Temporal fluctuations in chemotaxis gain implement a simulated-tempering strategy for efficient navigation in complex environments.

Karin O, Alon U iScience. 2021; 24(7):102796.

PMID: 34345809 PMC: 8319753. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102796.


Adaptive tuning of cell sensory diversity without changes in gene expression.

Kamino K, Keegstra J, Long J, Emonet T, Shimizu T Sci Adv. 2020; 6(46).

PMID: 33188019 PMC: 7673753. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abc1087.


Adaptation of Living Systems.

Tu Y, Rappel W Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2018; 9:183-205.

PMID: 30057689 PMC: 6060625. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-054046.


References
1.
Lazova M, Ahmed T, Bellomo D, Stocker R, Shimizu T . Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(33):13870-5. PMC: 3158140. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108608108. View

2.
Wu L, Valkema R, van Haastert P, Devreotes P . The G protein beta subunit is essential for multiple responses to chemoattractants in Dictyostelium. J Cell Biol. 1995; 129(6):1667-75. PMC: 2291184. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.129.6.1667. View

3.
Skoge M, Yue H, Erickstad M, Bae A, Levine H, Groisman A . Cellular memory in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(40):14448-53. PMC: 4210025. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412197111. View

4.
Goldbeter A, Koshland Jr D . An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981; 78(11):6840-4. PMC: 349147. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.6840. View

5.
Ma L, Janetopoulos C, Yang L, Devreotes P, Iglesias P . Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells. Biophys J. 2004; 87(6):3764-74. PMC: 1304889. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.045484. View