» Articles » PMID: 27785464

Phase-Dependent Modulation of Oscillatory Phase and Synchrony by Long-Lasting Depolarizing Inputs in Central Neurons

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Oct 28
PMID 27785464
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oscillatory neural activities have been implicated in various types of information processing in the CNS. The procerebral (PC) lobe of the land mollusk shows an ongoing oscillatory local field potential (LFP). Olfactory input increases both the frequency and spatial synchrony of the LFP oscillation by a nitric oxide (NO)-mediated mechanism, but how NO modulates the activity in a specific manner has been unclear. In the present study, we used electrical stimulation and NO uncaging to systematically analyze the response of the LFP oscillation and found phase-dependent effects on phase shifting and synchrony. The neurons that presumably release NO in the PC lobe preferentially fired at phases in which NO has a synchronizing effect, suggesting that the timing of NO release is regulated to induce a stereotyped response to natural sensory stimuli. The phase-response curve (PRC) describes the timing dependence of responses of an oscillatory system to external input. PRCs are usually constructed by recording the temporal shifts of the neural activity in response to brief electrical pulses. However, NO evokes a long-lasting depolarization persisting for several cycles of oscillation. The phase-response relationship obtained by NO stimulation was approximately the integral of the PRC. A similar relationship was also shown for regular firing of mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells receiving step depolarization, suggesting the generality of the results to oscillatory neural systems with highly distinct properties. These results indicate novel dynamic effects of long-lasting inputs on network oscillation and synchrony, which are based on simple and ubiquitous mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Perspective: Phase Amplitude Coupling-Based Phase-Dependent Neuromodulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Hwang B, Salimpour Y, Tsehay Y, Anderson W, Mills K Front Neurosci. 2020; 14:558967.

PMID: 33132822 PMC: 7550534. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.558967.


A review of the actions of Nitric Oxide in development and neuronal function in major invertebrate model systems.

Wright N AIMS Neurosci. 2020; 6(3):146-174.

PMID: 32341974 PMC: 7179362. DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.3.146.

References
1.
Gutkin B, Ermentrout G, Reyes A . Phase-response curves give the responses of neurons to transient inputs. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(2):1623-35. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00359.2004. View

2.
Bellamy T, Garthwaite J . Sub-second kinetics of the nitric oxide receptor, soluble guanylyl cyclase, in intact cerebellar cells. J Biol Chem. 2000; 276(6):4287-92. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M006677200. View

3.
Frien A, Eckhorn R . Functional coupling shows stronger stimulus dependency for fast oscillations than for low-frequency components in striate cortex of awake monkey. Eur J Neurosci. 2000; 12(4):1466-78. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00026.x. View

4.
Heck D, Thach W, Keating J . On-beam synchrony in the cerebellum as the mechanism for the timing and coordination of movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(18):7658-63. PMC: 1863450. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609966104. View

5.
Sakura M, Kabetani M, Watanabe S, Kirino Y . Impairment of olfactory discrimination by blockade of nitric oxide activity in the terrestrial slug Limax valentianus. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 370(2-3):257-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.025. View