» Articles » PMID: 27782854

Molecular Profiling of Advanced Solid Tumors and Patient Outcomes with Genotype-matched Clinical Trials: the Princess Margaret IMPACT/COMPACT Trial

Abstract

Background: The clinical utility of molecular profiling of tumor tissue to guide treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors is unknown. Our objectives were to evaluate the frequency of genomic alterations, clinical "actionability" of somatic variants, enrollment in mutation-targeted or other clinical trials, and outcome of molecular profiling for advanced solid tumor patients at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM).

Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors aged ≥18 years, good performance status, and archival tumor tissue available were prospectively consented. DNA from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was tested using a MALDI-TOF MS hotspot panel or a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Somatic variants were classified according to clinical actionability and an annotated report included in the electronic medical record. Oncologists were provided with summary tables of their patients' molecular profiling results and available mutation-specific clinical trials. Enrolment in genotype-matched versus genotype-unmatched clinical trials following release of profiling results and response by RECIST v1.1 criteria were evaluated.

Results: From March 2012 to July 2014, 1893 patients were enrolled and 1640 tested. After a median follow-up of 18 months, 245 patients (15 %) who were tested were subsequently treated on 277 therapeutic clinical trials, including 84 patients (5 %) on 89 genotype-matched trials. The overall response rate was higher in patients treated on genotype-matched trials (19 %) compared with genotype-unmatched trials (9 %; p < 0.026). In a multi-variable model, trial matching by genotype (p = 0.021) and female gender (p = 0.034) were the only factors associated with increased likelihood of treatment response.

Conclusions: Few advanced solid tumor patients enrolled in a prospective institutional molecular profiling trial were treated subsequently on genotype-matched therapeutic trials. In this non-randomized comparison, genotype-enrichment of early phase clinical trials was associated with an increased objective tumor response rate.

Trial Registration: NCT01505400 (date of registration 4 January 2012).

Citing Articles

Recent advances in the methods and clinical applications of next-generation sequencing in genomic profiling and precision cancer therapy.

Alsaiari A EXCLI J. 2025; 24:15-33.

PMID: 39967910 PMC: 11830917. DOI: 10.17179/excli2024-7594.


Cost-Utility Analysis of Genomic Profiling in Directing Targeted Therapy in Advanced NSCLC in Thailand.

Turongkaravee S, Nathisuwan S, Baisamut T, Meanwatthana J Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025; .

PMID: 39918787 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-025-00950-3.


Actionable alterations in glioblastoma: Insights from the implementation of genomic profiling as the standard of care from 2016 to 2023.

Fougner V, Urup T, Poulsen H, Grunnet K, Westmose C, Melchior L Neurooncol Pract. 2025; 12(1):34-44.

PMID: 39917766 PMC: 11798607. DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae082.


PPARα-mediated lipid metabolism reprogramming supports anti-EGFR therapy resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Van den Bossche V, Vignau J, Vigneron E, Rizzi I, Zaryouh H, Wouters A Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1237.

PMID: 39890801 PMC: 11785796. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56675-3.


Cancer treatment comes to age: from one-size-fits-all to next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies.

Parvizpour S, Beyrampour-Basmenj H, Razmara J, Farhadi F, Shamsir M Bioimpacts. 2024; 14(4):29957.

PMID: 39104623 PMC: 11298019. DOI: 10.34172/bi.2023.29957.


References
1.
Laskin J, Jones S, Aparicio S, Chia S, Chng C, Deyell R . Lessons learned from the application of whole-genome analysis to the treatment of patients with advanced cancers. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2016; 1(1):a000570. PMC: 4850882. DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a000570. View

2.
Yanagawa N, Leduc C, Kohler D, Saieg M, John T, Sykes J . Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog protein expression is an independent poor prognostic marker in lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7(10):1513-21. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182641d4f. View

3.
Van Allen E, Wagle N, Stojanov P, Perrin D, Cibulskis K, Marlow S . Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat Med. 2014; 20(6):682-8. PMC: 4048335. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3559. View

4.
Rodon J, Soria J, Berger R, Batist G, Tsimberidou A, Bresson C . Challenges in initiating and conducting personalized cancer therapy trials: perspectives from WINTHER, a Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Consortium trial. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(8):1791-8. PMC: 5006164. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv191. View

5.
Tsimberidou A, Iskander N, Hong D, Wheler J, Falchook G, Fu S . Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center initiative. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(22):6373-83. PMC: 4454458. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1627. View