» Articles » PMID: 27781037

Rescue Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes Leads to Better Outcomes Than Intravenous Thrombolysis Alone: A 'Real World' Applicability of the Recent Trials

Abstract

Background: The Interventional Management of Stroke III (IMS-III) trial demonstrated no benefit for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rt-PA) followed by endovascular therapy versus IV rt-PA alone. However, IMS-III mostly included earlier generation devices. The recent thrombectomy trials have incorporated the stent-retriever technology, but their generalizability remains unknown.

Methods: The North American Solitaire Acute Stroke (NASA) registry recruited patients treated with the Solitaire FR™ device between March 2012 and February 2013. The NASA-IMS-III-Like Group (NILG baseline NIHSS score ≥10 who received IV rt-PA) was compared to the IV rt-PA and IV + intra-arterial (IA)-IMS-III groups and the MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, SWIFT Prime, and REVASCAT trial controls to assess the stent-retriever treatment in the 'real-world' setting. The NILG was also compared to non-IV rt-PA NASA patients to evaluate the impact of IV rt-PA on thrombectomy.

Results: A total of 136 of the 354 NASA patients fulfilled criteria for the NILG. Baseline characteristics were well balanced across groups. Time from onset to puncture was higher in NILG than IV+IA-IMS-III patients (274 ± 112 vs. 208 ± 47 min, p < 0.0001). Occlusions involving the intracranial ICA, MCA-M1, or basilar arteries were more common in NILG than IV+IA-IMS-III patients (91.2 vs. 47.2%, p < 0.00001). Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b reperfusion was higher in NILG than IV+IA-IMS-III patients (74.3 vs. 39.6%, p < 0.00001). A 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 was more frequent in the NILG than IV+IA-IMS-III patients (51.9 vs. 40.8%, p = 0.03) and MR CLEAN (51.9 vs. 19.1%, p < 0.00001), ESCAPE (51.9 vs. 29.3%, p = 0.0002), SWIFT Prime (51.9 vs. 35.5%, p = 0.02), and REVASCAT (51.9 vs. 28.2%, p = 0.0003) controls. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage definitions varied across the different studies with rates ranging from 2.7% (ESCAPE) to 11.9% (NILG). The NILG 90-day mortality (24.4%) was higher than in SWIFT Prime but comparable to all other groups. IV rt-PA was an independent predictor of good outcome in NASA (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7).

Conclusion: Our results support the 'real-world' applicability of the recent thrombectomy trials.

Citing Articles

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Distal Medium Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multinational Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Salim H, Yedavalli V, Musmar B, Adeeb N, Essibayi M, El Naamani K J Stroke. 2024; 26(3):434-445.

PMID: 39266014 PMC: 11471362. DOI: 10.5853/jos.2024.01389.


Follow-up infarct volume on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging in distal medium vessel occlusions: the role of cerebral blood volume index.

Salim H, Lakhani D, Balar A, Musmar B, Adeeb N, Hoseinyazdi M J Neurol. 2024; 271(6):3389-3397.

PMID: 38507075 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12279-3.


Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Tigertriever as a Rescue Device After Failed Aspiration-Single Center Experience.

Piasecki P, Wierzbicki M, Narloch J Front Neurol. 2021; 11:603679.

PMID: 33551964 PMC: 7859263. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603679.


Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Rogers J, Lee J, Zhou Z, Cheung Y, Hripcsak G, Weng C J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 28(1):144-154.

PMID: 33164065 PMC: 7810452. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa224.


Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell B, Carpenter J, Cognard C, Dippel D AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(6):E61-E76.

PMID: 29773566 PMC: 7410632. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5638.


References
1.
Saver J, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener H, Levy E, Pereira V . Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(24):2285-95. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061. View

2.
Campbell B, Mitchell P, Kleinig T, Dewey H, Churilov L, Yassi N . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(11):1009-18. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792. View

3.
Broderick J, Palesch Y, Demchuk A, Yeatts S, Khatri P, Hill M . Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(10):893-903. PMC: 3651875. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214300. View

4.
Nguyen T, Malisch T, Castonguay A, Gupta R, Sun C, Martin C . Balloon guide catheter improves revascularization and clinical outcomes with the Solitaire device: analysis of the North American Solitaire Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2013; 45(1):141-5. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002407. View

5.
Haussen D, Nogueira R, Elhammady M, Yavagal D, Aziz-Sultan M, Johnson J . Infarct growth despite full reperfusion in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014; 8(2):117-21. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011497. View