Evidence for a Neural Basis of Age-related Visual Field Loss in Normal Observers
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Many studies have reported a decrease in visual field sensitivity as a function of increasing age in normal individuals. This age-related sensitivity loss has mainly been attributed to reductions in pupil size and transmission losses of the ocular media (particularly the lens), although neural losses in the retina, optic nerve and visual cortex have also been suggested. We evaluated the role of preretinal factors on normal visual field changes associated with aging. The central visual field of both eyes of 62 normal subjects (ages 20 to 72) were evaluated with Program 30-2 of a modified Humphrey Field Analyzer. Three test procedures were employed: (1) a standard visual field evaluation; (2) a yellow target on a yellow background condition (530 nm cutoff filter) to minimize the influence of lens transmission losses with age; and (3) a large target/high background luminance "yellow on yellow" test condition (530 nm cutoff filter, 635 asb background, Size V target) to minimize both pupil size and lens effects on central visual field sensitivity. In addition, relative lens absorption estimates were obtained for each subject. All three test conditions revealed a loss in visual field sensitivity with increasing age (approximately 0.8 dB per decade) but no meaningful differences were found among the three test procedures. Relative lens density increased with age but was not related to visual field sensitivity for any of the three test conditions. These data suggest that normal age-related visual field sensitivity changes are primarily due to neural losses rather than preretinal factors.
Multicenter Normative Data for Mesopic Microperimetry.
Pfau M, Jolly J, Charng J, von der Emde L, Muller P, Ansari G Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(12):27.
PMID: 39422918 PMC: 11512566. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.12.27.
Normative data for macular perimetry using the MP-3 microperimeter in healthy individuals.
Rodrigues Neto T, Silva Neto E, Higashi A, Megnis B, Haddad M, Monteiro M Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024; 87(5):e20210472.
PMID: 39298722 PMC: 11622843. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0472.
Channa R, Wolf R, Simo R, Brigell M, Fort P, Curcio C Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 4(3):100420.
PMID: 38284099 PMC: 10818256. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100420.
Effect of ethnic diversity on the saccadic reaction time among healthy Indian and Dutch adults.
Meethal N, Mazumdar D, Thepass G, Lemij H, van der Steen J, Pel J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):551.
PMID: 38177172 PMC: 10766981. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50670-8.
Srinivasan S, Sivaprasad S, Rajalakshmi R, Anjana R, Malik R, Kulothungan V Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11422.
PMID: 35794201 PMC: 9259684. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15425-x.