» Articles » PMID: 26966641

Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 12
PMID 26966641
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine normal values of the visual field (VF), corrected for age and reaction time (RT) for semiautomated kinetic perimetry (SKP) on the Octopus 900 perimeter, create a model describing the age-dependency of these values, and assess test-retest reliability for each isopter.

Methods: Eighty-six eyes of 86 ophthalmologically healthy subjects (age 11-79 years, 34 males, 52 females) underwent full-field kinetic perimetry with the Octopus 900 instrument. Stimulus size, luminance, velocity, meridional angle, subject age, and their interactions, were used to create a smooth multiple regression mathematical model (V/4e, III/4e, I/4e, I/3e, I/2e, I/1e, and I/1a isopters). Fourteen subjects (2 from each of 7 age groups) were evaluated on three separate sessions to assess test-retest reliability of the isopters. Reaction time (RT) was tested by presenting 12 designated RT-vectors between 10° and 20° within the seeing areas for the III/4e isopter (stimulus velocity, 3°/second). Four RT- vectors were presented at the nasal (0° or 180°), superotemporal (45°), and inferior (270°) meridians.

Results: The model fit was excellent ( = 0.94). The test-retest variability was less than 5°, and the median decrease in this deviation attributed to aging, per decade, for all age groups and for all stimulus sizes was 0.8°. No significant learning effect was observed for any age group or isopter.

Conclusion: Age-corrected and RT-corrected normative threshold values for full-field kinetic perimetry can be adequately described by a smooth multiple linear regression mathematical model.

Translational Relevance: A description of the entire kinetic VF is useful for assessing a full characterization of VF sensitivity, determining function losses associated with ocular and neurologic diseases, and for providing a more comprehensive analysis of structure-function relationships.

Citing Articles

Glaucoma Rehabilitation using ElectricAI Transcranial Stimulation (GREAT)-study protocol for randomized controlled trial using combined perceptual learning and transcranial electrical stimulation for vision enhancement.

Jia S, Mei X, Chen L, Chan L, Tsang C, Suen V Trials. 2024; 25(1):501.

PMID: 39039582 PMC: 11264395. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08314-3.


Visual and Auditory Spatial Localization in Younger and Older Adults.

Xiong Y, Addleman D, Nguyen N, Nelson P, Legge G Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:838194.

PMID: 35493928 PMC: 9043801. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.838194.


Three-Year Changes in Visual Function in the Placebo Group of a Randomized Double-Blind International Multicenter Safety Study: Analysis of Electroretinography, Perimetry, Color Vision, and Visual Acuity in Individuals With Chronic Stable Angina....

Zrenner E, Holder G, Schiefer U, Wild J Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(1):2.

PMID: 34982095 PMC: 8742521. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.1.2.


Dissociation between red and white stimulus perception: A perimetric quantification of protanopic color vision deficiencies.

Wetzel D, Ungewiss J, Worner M, Wilhelm H, Schiefer U PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0260362.

PMID: 34928982 PMC: 8687589. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260362.


Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry.

Ma X, Tang L, Chen X, Zeng L BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21(1):343.

PMID: 34551740 PMC: 8459489. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02056-5.


References
1.
Stewart W, Shields M, Ollie A . Peripheral visual field testing by automated kinetic perimetry in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988; 106(2):202-6. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130212028. View

2.
Iwase A, Kitazawa Y, Ohno Y . On age-related norms of the visual field. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1988; 32(4):429-37. View

3.
Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J . The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107(1):81-6. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010083032. View

4.
Wall M, Chauhan B, Frisen L, House P, Brito C . Visual field of high-pass resolution perimetry in normal subjects. J Glaucoma. 2004; 13(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200402000-00004. View

5.
Stewart W . Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992; 70(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02095.x. View