» Articles » PMID: 27775024

Neurobiochemical Changes in the Vicinity of a Nanostructured Neural Implant

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Oct 25
PMID 27775024
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neural interface technologies including recording and stimulation electrodes are currently in the early phase of clinical trials aiming to help patients with spinal cord injuries, degenerative disorders, strokes interrupting descending motor pathways, or limb amputations. Their lifetime is of key importance; however, it is limited by the foreign body response of the tissue causing the loss of neurons and a reactive astrogliosis around the implant surface. Improving the biocompatibility of implant surfaces, especially promoting neuronal attachment and regeneration is therefore essential. In our work, bioactive properties of implanted black polySi nanostructured surfaces (520-800 nm long nanopillars with a diameter of 150-200 nm) were investigated and compared to microstructured Si surfaces in eight-week-long in vivo experiments. Glial encapsulation and local neuronal cell loss were characterised using GFAP and NeuN immunostaining respectively, followed by systematic image analysis. Regarding the severity of gliosis, no significant difference was observed in the vicinity of the different implant surfaces, however, the number of surviving neurons close to the nanostructured surface was higher than that of the microstructured ones. Our results imply that the functionality of implanted microelectrodes covered by Si nanopillars may lead to improved long-term recordings.

Citing Articles

Biomaterials for neuroengineering: applications and challenges.

Wu H, Feng E, Yin H, Zhang Y, Chen G, Zhu B Regen Biomater. 2025; 12:rbae137.

PMID: 40007617 PMC: 11855295. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae137.


biocompatibility evaluation of functional electrically stimulating microelectrodes on primary glia.

Tsui C, Mirkiani S, Roszko D, Churchward M, Mushahwar V, Todd K Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1351087.

PMID: 38314352 PMC: 10834782. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1351087.


Manufacturing Processes of Implantable Microelectrode Array for In Vivo Neural Electrophysiological Recordings and Stimulation: A State-Of-the-Art Review.

Yi D, Yao Y, Wang Y, Chen L J Micro Nanomanuf. 2023; 10(4):041001.

PMID: 37860671 PMC: 10583290. DOI: 10.1115/1.4063179.


Immunohistological responses in mice implanted with Parylene HT - ITO ECoG devices.

Madarasz M, Fedor F, Fekete Z, Rozsa B Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1209913.

PMID: 37746144 PMC: 10513038. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1209913.


Commonly Overlooked Factors in Biocompatibility Studies of Neural Implants.

Kumosa L Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 10(6):e2205095.

PMID: 36596702 PMC: 9951391. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202205095.


References
1.
Maxwell W, Follows R, Ashhurst D, Berry M . The response of the cerebral hemisphere of the rat to injury. I. The mature rat. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990; 328(1250):479-500. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0121. View

2.
Jacque C, Vinner C, Kujas M, Raoul M, RACADOT J, Baumann N . Determination of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in human brain tumors. J Neurol Sci. 1978; 35(1):147-55. DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(78)90107-7. View

3.
Ma J, Cui F, Liu B, Xu Q . Atomic force and confocal microscopy for the study of cortical cells cultured on silicon wafers. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007; 18(5):851-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0071-4. View

4.
Lin C, Lin J, Chen Y, Shen H, Wei L, Yeh Y . Hyaluronic acid inhibits the glial scar formation after brain damage with tissue loss in rats. Surg Neurol. 2009; 72 Suppl 2:S50-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2009.09.004. View

5.
Potter K, Buck A, Self W, Capadona J . Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses. J Neural Eng. 2012; 9(4):046020. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/046020. View