» Articles » PMID: 27774717

Evaluation and Comparison of Tools for Diagnosing Problematic Prescription Opioid Use Among Chronic Pain Patients

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 Oct 25
PMID 27774717
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prescription opioid medications are commonly used for the treatment of chronic pain. Assessments of problematic opioid use among pain patients are inconsistent across studies, partially due to differences between various measures. Therefore, the most appropriate measure to use is often unclear. In this study we assessed problematic opioid use in a sample of 551 individuals receiving treatment for chronic pain, using three questionnaires: the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule - Fourth Edition (AUDADIS-IV), the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) questionnaire and Portenoy's criteria (PC). These questionnaires yielded discordant positive rates of problematic use: 52.6%, 28.7%, and 17.1%, respectively, which did not change substantially when excluding AUDADIS-IV criteria of physical symptoms of tolerance and withdrawal. Although these three questionnaires share some statistically correlated content-based congruent questions, positive response rates to them were significantly different based on construction features, including questionnaires' referred time-frame, wording of questions and response alternatives. The findings of the present study illustrate strengths and limitations of the AUDADIS-IV, COMM and PC in diagnosing problematic opioid use in a population of adults suffering from chronic pain, and highlight the importance of recognizing and addressing specific questionnaire and question-related differences when identifying problematic opioid use in this population.

Citing Articles

Identifying problematic opioid use in electronic health record data: Are we looking in the right place?.

Schirle L, Kwun S, Suh A, Sanchez-Roige S, Jeffery A, Samuels D J Opioid Manag. 2023; 19(1):5-9.

PMID: 36683296 PMC: 9987029. DOI: 10.5055/jom.2023.0754.


Two data-driven approaches to identifying the spectrum of problematic opioid use: A pilot study within a chronic pain cohort.

Schirle L, Jeffery A, Yaqoob A, Sanchez-Roige S, Samuels D Int J Med Inform. 2021; 156:104621.

PMID: 34673309 PMC: 8609775. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104621.


Evaluation and comparison of tools for diagnosing problematic prescription opioid use among chronic pain patients.

Kovatch M, Feingold D, Elkana O, Lev-Ran S Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016; 26(4).

PMID: 27774717 PMC: 6877121. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1542.

References
1.
Edwards A . Social desirability and probability of endorsement of items in the interpersonal check list. J Abnorm Psychol. 1957; 55(3):394-6. DOI: 10.1037/h0048497. View

2.
Passik S, Kirsh K, Whitcomb L, Portenoy R, Katz N, Kleinman L . A new tool to assess and document pain outcomes in chronic pain patients receiving opioid therapy. Clin Ther. 2004; 26(4):552-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90057-4. View

3.
Portenoy R . Opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: a review of the critical issues. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996; 11(4):203-17. DOI: 10.1016/0885-3924(95)00187-5. View

4.
Sehgal N, Manchikanti L, Smith H . Prescription opioid abuse in chronic pain: a review of opioid abuse predictors and strategies to curb opioid abuse. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(3 Suppl):ES67-92. View

5.
Lowe B, Decker O, Muller S, Brahler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W . Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008; 46(3):266-74. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093. View