» Articles » PMID: 27768968

Expanding Clinical Laboratory Tobacco Product Evaluation Methods to Loose-leaf Tobacco Vaporizers

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 Oct 22
PMID 27768968
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Novel tobacco products entering the US market include electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) and products advertised to "heat, not burn" tobacco. There is a growing literature regarding the acute effects of ECIGs. Less is known about "heat, not burn" products. This study's purpose was to expand existing clinical laboratory methods to examine, in cigarette smokers, the acute effects of a "heat, not burn" "loose-leaf tobacco vaporizer" (LLTV).

Methods: Plasma nicotine and breath carbon monoxide (CO) concentration and tobacco abstinence symptom severity were measured before and after two 10-puff (30-s interpuff interval) product use bouts separated by 60min. LLTV effects were compared to participants' own brand (OB) cigarettes and an ECIG (3.3V; 1.5ohm; 18mg/ml nicotine).

Results: Relative to OB, LLTV increased plasma nicotine concentration to a lesser degree, did not increase CO, and did not appear to reduce abstinence symptoms as effectively. Relative to ECIG, LLTV nicotine and CO delivery and abstinence symptom suppression did not differ. Participants reported that both the LLTV and ECIG were significantly less satisfying than OB.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate that LLTVs are capable of delivering nicotine and suppressing tobacco abstinence symptoms partially; acute effects of these products can be evaluated using existing clinical laboratory methods. Results can inform tobacco product regulation and may be predictive of the extent that these products have the potential to benefit or harm overall public health.

Citing Articles

Assessment of human abuse potential of an unflavored, sucralose-sweetened electronic cigarette in combustible cigarette smokers.

Maloney S, Hoetger C, Bono R, Lester Scholtes R, Combs M, Karaoghlanian N Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024; 32(5):588-603.

PMID: 38815111 PMC: 11870153. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000720.


Critical appraisal of interventional clinical trials assessing heated tobacco products: a systematic review.

Braznell S, van den Akker A, Metcalfe C, Taylor G, Hartmann-Boyce J Tob Control. 2022; 33(3):383-394.

PMID: 36347620 PMC: 11041615. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057522.


'It's like if a vape pen and a cigarette had a baby': a mixed methods study of perceptions and use of IQOS among US young adults.

Duan Z, Le D, Ciceron A, Dickey-Chasins R, Wysota C, Bar-Zeev Y Health Educ Res. 2022; 37(5):364-377.

PMID: 36036655 PMC: 9502850. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyac019.


"It's Like Jogging Next to the Highway": A Qualitative Analysis of the Motivations and Experiences of Single-, Dual-, and Ex-Users of IQOS in The Netherlands.

Havermans A, van Nierop L, Pauwels C, Talhout R Toxics. 2022; 10(6).

PMID: 35736892 PMC: 9229017. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10060283.


Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review.

Znyk M, Jurewicz J, Kaleta D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(12).

PMID: 34205612 PMC: 8296358. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126651.


References
1.
Lopez A, Hiler M, Soule E, Ramoa C, Karaoghlanian N, Lipato T . Effects of Electronic Cigarette Liquid Nicotine Concentration on Plasma Nicotine and Puff Topography in Tobacco Cigarette Smokers: A Preliminary Report. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 18(5):720-3. PMC: 5896822. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv182. View

2.
Cobb C, Blank M, Morlett A, Shihadeh A, Jaroudi E, Karaoghlanian N . Comparison of puff topography, toxicant exposure, and subjective effects in low- and high-frequency waterpipe users: a double-blind, placebo-control study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17(6):667-74. PMC: 4838047. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu196. View

3.
Pickworth W, Bunker E, Henningfield J . Transdermal nicotine: reduction of smoking with minimal abuse liability. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994; 115(1-2):9-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02244745. View

4.
Hecht S, Carmella S, Kotandeniya D, Pillsbury M, Chen M, Ransom B . Evaluation of toxicant and carcinogen metabolites in the urine of e-cigarette users versus cigarette smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17(6):704-9. PMC: 4481723. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu218. View

5.
Hughes J, Keely J, Callas P . Ever users versus never users of a "less risky" cigarette. Psychol Addict Behav. 2005; 19(4):439-42. DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.439. View