» Articles » PMID: 26082330

Nicotine Absorption from Electronic Cigarette Use: Comparison Between Experienced Consumers (vapers) and Naïve Users (smokers)

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Jun 18
PMID 26082330
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are nicotine delivery devices that are proposed as tobacco harm reduction products to smokers. Nicotine delivery from ECs is potentially important in their efficacy as smoking substitutes. Herein, nicotine delivery from using a new-generation EC device (variable-wattage, set at 9 W) was evaluated, comparing experienced (vapers) with naïve users (smokers). Twenty-four vapers and 23 smokers participated to the study. They were asked to obtain 10 puffs in 5 minutes and then use the EC ad lib for 60 more minutes (total duration of use: 65 minutes). An 18 mg/mL nicotine-containing liquid was used. Blood samples were obtained at baseline, 5-minutes and every 15 minutes thereafter, while number of puffs and average puff duration were recorded. Although at baseline both groups had similar plasma nicotine levels, smokers consistently exhibited lower levels at all time-periods; at 5-minutes the levels were lower by 46%, while during the subsequent period they were lower by 43% (at 65-minutes) to 54% (at 20-minutes). Both groups took similar number of puffs, but smokers had average puff duration of 2.3 s compared to 3.5 s in vapers. Even in vapers, plasma nicotine levels at 5 minutes were lower than those observed after smoking 1 tobacco cigarette.

Citing Articles

The effects of flavored vaped e-liquids on cultured human macrophages derived from the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Bradley C, Walker-Franklin I, Kovach A, Sivaraman V, Onyenwoke R Toxicol In Vitro. 2025; 104:106013.

PMID: 39894183 PMC: 11845287. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106013.


Understanding the nicotine dose delivered by electronic nicotine delivery systems in a single puff: the importance of nicotine flux and puff duration.

Eissenberg T, Shihadeh A Tob Control. 2024; .

PMID: 38897725 PMC: 11655706. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-058485.


Chemical Analysis of Exhaled Vape Emissions: Unraveling the Complexities of Humectant Fragmentation in a Human Trial Study.

Hopstock K, Perraud V, Dalton A, Barletta B, Meinardi S, Weltman R Chem Res Toxicol. 2024; 37(6):1000-1010.

PMID: 38769630 PMC: 11187636. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00088.


Exploring the opinions and potential impact of unflavoured e-liquid on smoking cessation among people who smoke and smoking relapse among people who previously smoked and now use e-cigarettes: findings from a UK-based mixed methods study.

Khouja J, Dyer M, Havill M, Dockrell M, Munafo M, Attwood A Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):90.

PMID: 38702809 PMC: 11067290. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01003-z.


Changes in biomarkers of exposure and withdrawal symptom among Chinese adult smokers after completely or partially switching from combustible cigarettes to an electronic nicotine delivery system.

Li C, Guo Y, Duan K, Wang Z, Wu Z, Jiang X Intern Emerg Med. 2024; 19(3):669-679.

PMID: 38316693 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-023-03518-y.


References
1.
McQueen A, Tower S, Sumner W . Interviews with "vapers": implications for future research with electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 13(9):860-7. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr088. View

2.
Douptcheva N, Gmel G, Studer J, Deline S, Etter J . Use of electronic cigarettes among young Swiss men. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013; 67(12):1075-6. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203152. View

3.
Farsalinos K, Voudris V, Le Houezec J . Risks of attempting to regulate nicotine flux in electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014; 17(2):163-4. PMC: 4892707. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu207. View

4.
Kralikova E, Novak J, West O, Kmetova A, Hajek P . Do e-cigarettes have the potential to compete with conventional cigarettes?: a survey of conventional cigarette smokers' experiences with e-cigarettes. Chest. 2013; 144(5):1609-1614. DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-2842. View

5.
Fagerstrom K . Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 14(1):75-8. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr137. View