» Articles » PMID: 27752086

Functional Diversity Exhibits a Diverse Relationship with Area, Even a Decreasing One

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Oct 19
PMID 27752086
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relationship between species richness and area is one of the few well-established laws in ecology, and one might expect a similar relationship with functional diversity (FD). However, only a few studies investigate the relationship between trait-based FD and area, the Functional Diversity - Area Relationship (FDAR). To examine FDAR, we constructed the species accumulation curve and the corresponding FD curve. We used plant diversity data from nested plots (1-128 m), recorded on the Volcanic islands of Santorini Archipelagos, Greece. Six multidimensional FD indices were calculated using 26 traits. We identified a typology of FDARs depending on the facet of FD analyzed: (A) strongly positive for indices quantifying the range of functional traits in the community, (B) negative correlation for indices quantifying the evenness in the distribution of abundance in the trait space, (C) no clear pattern for indices reflecting the functional similarity of species and (D) idiosyncratic patterns with area for functional divergence. As area increases, the range of traits observed in the community increases, but the abundance of traits does not increase proportionally and some traits become dominant, implying a reliance on some functions that may be located in either the center or the periphery of the trait space.

Citing Articles

Detection of functional diversity gradients and their geoclimatic filters is sensitive to data types (occurrence vs. abundance) and spatial scales (sites vs. regions).

Silva J, Souza A, Vitoria A Plant Divers. 2025; 46(6):732-743.

PMID: 39811812 PMC: 11726052. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2024.06.004.


Functional diversity of snakes is explained by the landscape composition at multiple areas of influence.

Rincon-Aranguri M, Toro-Cardona F, Galeano S, Roa-Fuentes L, Urbina-Cardona N Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(7):e10352.

PMID: 37502301 PMC: 10369374. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10352.


Vegetation Height as the Primary Driver of Functional Changes in Orthopteran Assemblages in a Roadside Habitat.

Rebrina F, Reinhold K, Tvrtkovic N, Gulin V, Brigic A Insects. 2022; 13(7).

PMID: 35886748 PMC: 9317414. DOI: 10.3390/insects13070572.


Recommendations to enhance breeding bird diversity in managed plantation forests determined using LiDAR.

Tew E, Conway G, Henderson I, Milodowski D, Swinfield T, Sutherland W Ecol Appl. 2022; 32(7):e2678.

PMID: 35588196 PMC: 9787994. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2678.


Space and patchiness affects diversity-function relationships in fungal decay communities.

OLeary J, Journeaux K, Houthuijs K, Engel J, Sommer U, Viant M ISME J. 2020; 15(3):720-731.

PMID: 33067587 PMC: 8027639. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-00808-7.


References
1.
Guillemot N, Kulbicki M, Chabanet P, Vigliola L . Functional redundancy patterns reveal non-random assembly rules in a species-rich marine assemblage. PLoS One. 2011; 6(10):e26735. PMC: 3198825. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026735. View

2.
Diaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quetier F, Grigulis K, Robson T . Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(52):20684-9. PMC: 2410063. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704716104. View

3.
Zhang H, John R, Peng Z, Yuan J, Chu C, Du G . The relationship between species richness and evenness in plant communities along a successional gradient: a study from sub-alpine meadows of the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49024. PMC: 3494667. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049024. View

4.
Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A . Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(22):12765-70. PMC: 240692. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2235465100. View

5.
Villeger S, Mason N, Mouillot D . New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology. 2008; 89(8):2290-301. DOI: 10.1890/07-1206.1. View