» Articles » PMID: 25071413

Multifaceted Diversity-area Relationships Reveal Global Hotspots of Mammalian Species, Trait and Lineage Diversity

Abstract

Aim: To define biome-scale hotspots of phylogenetic and functional mammalian biodiversity (PD and FD, respectively) and compare them to 'classical' hotspots based on species richness (SR) only.

Location: Global.

Methods: SR, PD & FD were computed for 782 terrestrial ecoregions using distribution ranges of 4616 mammalian species. We used a set of comprehensive diversity indices unified by a recent framework that incorporates the species relative coverage in each ecoregion. We build large-scale multifaceted diversity-area relationships to rank ecoregions according to their levels of biodiversity while accounting for the effect of area on each diversity facet. Finally we defined hotspots as the top-ranked ecoregions.

Results: While ignoring species relative coverage led to a relative good congruence between biome top ranked SR, PD and FD hotspots, ecoregions harboring a rich and abundantly represented evolutionary history and functional diversity did not match with top ranked ecoregions defined by species richness. More importantly PD and FD hotspots showed important spatial mismatches. We also found that FD and PD generally reached their maximum values faster than species richness as a function of area.

Main Conclusions: The fact that PD/FD reach faster their maximal value than SR may suggest that the two former facets might be less vulnerable to habitat loss than the latter. While this point is expected, it is the first time that it is quantified at global scale and should have important consequences in conservation. Incorporating species relative coverage into the delineation of multifaceted hotspots of diversity lead to weak congruence between SR, PD and FD hotspots. This means that maximizing species number may fail at preserving those nodes (in the phylogenetic or functional tree) that are relatively abundant in the ecoregion. As a consequence it may be of prime importance to adopt a multifaceted biodiversity perspective to inform conservation strategies at global scale.

Citing Articles

Global multifaceted biodiversity patterns, centers, and conservation needs in angiosperms.

Luo A, Li Y, Shrestha N, Xu X, Su X, Li Y Sci China Life Sci. 2024; 67(4):817-828.

PMID: 38217639 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2430-2.


How Biodiversity, Climate and Landscape Drive Functional Redundancy of British Butterflies.

Lazarina M, Michailidou D, Tsianou M, Kallimanis A Insects. 2023; 14(9).

PMID: 37754690 PMC: 10531656. DOI: 10.3390/insects14090722.


The spatial scaling of food web structure across European biogeographical regions.

Galiana N, Barros C, Braga J, Ficetola G, Maiorano L, Thuiller W Ecography. 2023; 44(5):653-664.

PMID: 36620425 PMC: 7614028. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05229.


Recommendations to enhance breeding bird diversity in managed plantation forests determined using LiDAR.

Tew E, Conway G, Henderson I, Milodowski D, Swinfield T, Sutherland W Ecol Appl. 2022; 32(7):e2678.

PMID: 35588196 PMC: 9787994. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2678.


Ecological network complexity scales with area.

Galiana N, Lurgi M, Bastazini V, Bosch J, Cagnolo L, Cazelles K Nat Ecol Evol. 2022; 6(3):307-314.

PMID: 35027724 PMC: 7614050. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01644-4.


References
1.
Gravel D, Bell T, Barbera C, Combe M, Pommier T, Mouquet N . Phylogenetic constraints on ecosystem functioning. Nat Commun. 2012; 3:1117. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2123. View

2.
Petchey O, Gaston K . Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(6):741-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x. View

3.
Srivastava D, Cadotte M, MacDonald A, Marushia R, Mirotchnick N . Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecol Lett. 2012; 15(7):637-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01795.x. View

4.
Pavoine S, Bonsall M . Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010; 86(4):792-812. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00171.x. View

5.
Ceballos G, Ehrlich P . Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(51):19374-9. PMC: 1698439. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609334103. View