» Articles » PMID: 27736748

Rat Models of Spinal Cord Injury: from Pathology to Potential Therapies

Overview
Journal Dis Model Mech
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Oct 14
PMID 27736748
Citations 166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A long-standing goal of spinal cord injury research is to develop effective spinal cord repair strategies for the clinic. Rat models of spinal cord injury provide an important mammalian model in which to evaluate treatment strategies and to understand the pathological basis of spinal cord injuries. These models have facilitated the development of robust tests for assessing the recovery of locomotor and sensory functions. Rat models have also allowed us to understand how neuronal circuitry changes following spinal cord injury and how recovery could be promoted by enhancing spontaneous regenerative mechanisms and by counteracting intrinsic inhibitory factors. Rat studies have also revealed possible routes to rescuing circuitry and cells in the acute stage of injury. Spatiotemporal and functional studies in these models highlight the therapeutic potential of manipulating inflammation, scarring and myelination. In addition, potential replacement therapies for spinal cord injury, including grafts and bridges, stem primarily from rat studies. Here, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of rat experimental spinal cord injury models and summarize knowledge gained from these models. We also discuss how an emerging understanding of different forms of injury, their pathology and degree of recovery has inspired numerous treatment strategies, some of which have led to clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Kinematic and sensory-motor analysis of the effects of treatments with photobiomodulation in rats with experimentally induced spinal injury.

Karatanasov Beloni L, Borges de Lima L, Campos Chaves Correia D, Correa Mendes A, Barros SanntAnna L, Lo Schiavo Arisawa E Lasers Med Sci. 2025; 40(1):134.

PMID: 40064714 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-025-04399-7.


Electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve restores inspiratory diaphragm function in mice after spinal cord injury.

Walling I, Baumgartner S, Patel M, Crone S Front Neural Circuits. 2025; 18:1480291.

PMID: 39911754 PMC: 11794311. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2024.1480291.


A comprehensive transcriptional reference for severity and progression in spinal cord injury reveals novel translational biomarker genes.

Grillo-Risco R, Hidalgo M, Martinez-Rojas B, Moreno-Manzano V, Garcia-Garcia F J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):160.

PMID: 39905473 PMC: 11796280. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06009-6.


Imaging Demyelinated Axons After Spinal Cord Injuries with PET Tracer [F]3F4AP.

Ramos-Torres K, Conti S, Zhou Y, Tiss A, Caravagna C, Takahashi K J Nucl Med. 2025; 66(2):293-301.

PMID: 39819685 PMC: 11800733. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268242.


Neurons Are Not All the Same: Diversity in Neuronal Populations and Their Intrinsic Responses to Spinal Cord Injury.

Siebert J, Kennedy K, Osterhout D ASN Neuro. 2025; 17(1):2440299.

PMID: 39819292 PMC: 11877619. DOI: 10.1080/17590914.2024.2440299.


References
1.
Courtine G, Song B, Roy R, Zhong H, Herrmann J, Ao Y . Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2007; 14(1):69-74. PMC: 2916740. DOI: 10.1038/nm1682. View

2.
Nagoshi N, Nakashima H, Fehlings M . Riluzole as a neuroprotective drug for spinal cord injury: from bench to bedside. Molecules. 2015; 20(5):7775-89. PMC: 6272473. DOI: 10.3390/molecules20057775. View

3.
Tuszynski M, Wang Y, Graham L, McHale K, Gao M, Wu D . Neural stem cells in models of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2014; 261:494-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.07.011. View

4.
Barnabe-Heider F, Goritz C, Sabelstrom H, Takebayashi H, Pfrieger F, Meletis K . Origin of new glial cells in intact and injured adult spinal cord. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 7(4):470-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.014. View

5.
Dolan E, Tator C, Endrenyi L . The value of decompression for acute experimental spinal cord compression injury. J Neurosurg. 1980; 53(6):749-55. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1980.53.6.0749. View