» Articles » PMID: 27703607

Assessment of Non-carious Root Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession: A Descriptive Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Exp Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 Oct 6
PMID 27703607
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this descriptive study was to observe the distribution of four different classes of non-carious cervical root surface discrepancies in teeth with gingival recession. Additionally to explore the different treatment modalities in the literature for each of these defects.

Material And Methods: A total of 150 subjects with at least one labial gingival recession were included in the study. 1400 teeth were evaluated using 2.5 X magnification loupes and UNC -15 probe for the presence of the cemento-enamel junction and step like defects according to Pini-Prato's classification: A-, identifiable CEJ without defect; A+, identifiable CEJ with defect; B-, unidentifiable CEJ without defect, B+, unidentifiable CEJ with defect. Further a comprehensive electronic and hand search of pubmed indexed journals was performed to identify appropriate treatment modalities for these defects and their predictability following restorative/surgical or combination of both.

Results: A total of 1400 teeth with exposed root surfaces were examined (793 Maxillary; 607 mandibular). 499 teeth were A-, 405 were A+, 322 were B+ and 174 were B-. The distribution of these defects in different teeth was: 36% premolars, 32% molars, 21% incisors and 11% canines, collectively 68% in the aesthetic zone.

Conclusions: Majority of these lesions are in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Hence the presence of the CEJ and the defect must be taken into account while managing these defects surgically. Cervical abrasion, gingival recession, magnification loupes, root coverage, step defects.

Citing Articles

Periodontal Evaluation for a New Alkasite Restorative Material in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Mustafa K, Alfakhry G, Milly H Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(6):e70025.

PMID: 39400529 PMC: 11471885. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.70025.


Current state about root coverage using soft-tissue substitutes in the presence of noncarious cervical lesions: A literature review.

Huaman-Mendoza A, Reis I, Ganhito J, Carvalho C, Micheli G, Pannuti C J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023; 27(4):344-351.

PMID: 37593556 PMC: 10431232. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_388_22.


Comparison of coronally advanced versus semilunar coronally repositioned flap in the management of maxillary gingival recessions.

Govindasamy B, Krishna Naik V, Balasundaram A Saudi Dent J. 2021; 33(7):642-649.

PMID: 34803313 PMC: 8589608. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.05.005.

References
1.
Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M . Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol. 2006; 77(4):714-21. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050038. View

2.
Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus K, Bringolf U, Lussi A . Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 17(3):725-9. PMC: 3627031. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0753-x. View

3.
Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Fabbro M, Basso M, Weinstein R . The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study. J Periodontol. 2005; 76(6):899-907. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.899. View

4.
Loe H, Anerud A, BOYSEN H, Morrison E . Natural history of periodontal disease in man. Rapid, moderate and no loss of attachment in Sri Lankan laborers 14 to 46 years of age. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13(5):431-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01487.x. View

5.
Smukler H, Landsberg J . The toothbrush and gingival traumatic injury. J Periodontol. 1984; 55(12):713-9. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.12.713. View