» Articles » PMID: 27697112

Polymer Brush: a Promising Grafting Approach to Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering

Overview
Journal BMB Rep
Date 2016 Oct 5
PMID 27697112
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polymer brush is a soft material unit tethered covalently on the surface of scaffolds. It can induce functional and structural modification of a substrate's properties. Such surface coating approach has attracted special attentions in the fields of stem cell biology, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine due to facile fabrication, usability of various polymers, extracellular matrix (ECM)-like structural features, and in vivo stability. Here, we summarized polymer brush-based grafting approaches comparing self-assembled monolayer (SAM)-based coating method, in addition to physico-chemical characterization techniques for surfaces such as wettability, stiffness/ elasticity, roughness, and chemical composition that can affect cell adhesion, differentiation, and proliferation. We also reviewed recent advancements in cell biological applications of polymer brushes by focusing on stem cell differentiation and 3D supports/implants for tissue formation. Understanding cell behaviors on polymer brushes in the scale of nanometer length can contribute to systematic understandings of cellular responses at the interface of polymers and scaffolds and their simultaneous effects on cell behaviors for promising platform designs. [BMB Reports 2016; 49(12): 655-661].

Citing Articles

Salt-Controlled Vertical Segregation of Mixed Polymer Brushes.

Mikhailov I, Darinskii A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684885 PMC: 11642477. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252313175.


Modern advances in spinal cord regeneration: hydrogel combined with neural stem cells.

Rybachuk O, Nesterenko Y, Zhovannyk V Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1419797.

PMID: 38994202 PMC: 11236698. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1419797.


Decellularized diseased tissues: current state-of-the-art and future directions.

Li X, Shan J, Chen X, Cui H, Wen G, Yu Y MedComm (2020). 2023; 4(6):e399.

PMID: 38020712 PMC: 10661834. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.399.


Highly Adhesive Antimicrobial Coatings for External Fixation Devices.

Bredikhin M, Sawant S, Gross C, Antonio E, Borodinov N, Luzinov I Gels. 2023; 9(8).

PMID: 37623093 PMC: 10453896. DOI: 10.3390/gels9080639.


Chains Stiffness Effect on the Vertical Segregation of Mixed Polymer Brushes in Selective Solvent.

Lukiev I, Mogelnitskaya Y, Mikhailov I, Darinskii A Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36771945 PMC: 9919982. DOI: 10.3390/polym15030644.


References
1.
Gautrot J, Trappmann B, Oceguera-Yanez F, Connelly J, He X, Watt F . Exploiting the superior protein resistance of polymer brushes to control single cell adhesion and polarisation at the micron scale. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(18):5030-41. PMC: 3712172. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.066. View

2.
Petrie T, Raynor J, Dumbauld D, Lee T, Jagtap S, Templeman K . Multivalent integrin-specific ligands enhance tissue healing and biomaterial integration. Sci Transl Med. 2010; 2(45):45ra60. PMC: 3128787. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001002. View

3.
Gon S, Kumar K, Nusslein K, Santore M . How Bacteria Adhere to Brushy PEG Surfaces: Clinging to Flaws and Compressing the Brush. Macromolecules. 2012; 45(20):8373-8381. PMC: 3494094. DOI: 10.1021/ma300981r. View

4.
Deng Y, Zhang X, Zhao X, Li Q, Ye Z, Li Z . Long-term self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells on peptide-decorated poly(OEGMA-co-HEMA) brushes under fully defined conditions. Acta Biomater. 2013; 9(11):8840-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.017. View

5.
Ando D, Zandi R, Kim Y, Colvin M, Rexach M, Gopinathan A . Nuclear pore complex protein sequences determine overall copolymer brush structure and function. Biophys J. 2014; 106(9):1997-2007. PMC: 4017316. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.021. View