» Articles » PMID: 27696111

Atrial-focused Views Improve the Accuracy of Two-dimensional Echocardiographic Measurements of the Left and Right Atrial Volumes: a Contribution to the Increase in Normal Values in the Guidelines Update

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Oct 4
PMID 27696111
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current guidelines recommend that the atria be measured in 2D echocardiographic (2DE) apical views using the method-of-disks (MOD) or area-length (AL) technique as an alternative, although no definitive data exists that these are interchangeable. However, standard apical views maximize the long-axis of the left ventricle, rather than the dimensions of the atria, resulting in atrial foreshortening. We hypothesized that the increase in normal values of atrial volumes in the recent guidelines update was driven by data obtained using either the AL technique or dedicated atrial-focused views, which maximize the longitudinal dimension of the atria and thus provide larger volumes than the MOD measurements in standard apical views. We prospectively studied 30 patients (Philips iE33) to compare 2DE measurements of left and right atrial volumes (LAV, RAV) using the MOD and AL techniques in standard and atrial-focused views, against 3D echocardiography (3DE) derived volumes (QLab) as a reference. Compared to standard views, atrial-focused views provided significantly larger MOD volumes for both atria, which were in better agreement with 3DE, as reflected by higher correlation coefficients (LAV: r = 0.95 vs. 0.89; RAV: r = 0.89 vs. 0.84), smaller biases (LAV: -1 ml vs. 7 ml; RAV: 3 ml vs. 7 ml) and tighter limits of agreement. This was also the case for the AL measurements, which were minimally larger than the MOD values (NS) for both atria. In conclusion, atrial-focused views are a more accurate alternative to standard apical views, which provides larger volumes. This finding can explain the increase in the normal values in the recent guidelines update, which was mostly driven by the use of atrial-focused views, rather than by the differences between MOD and AL techniques. This understanding is essential in order to correctly integrate the revised normal values into clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Lone Giant Atrium as a Variant of Atrial Cardiomyopathy: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Case Series.

Meier C, Olteanu G, Ellermeier M, Eisenblatter M, Gielen S J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39452268 PMC: 11508881. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11100297.


Evaluation of left ventricular and left atrial volumetric function from native MR multislice 4D flow magnitude data.

Reiter C, Reiter G, Krauter C, Scherr D, Schmidt A, Fuchsjager M Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(2):981-993.

PMID: 37580598 PMC: 10853296. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10017-3.


Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal.

Altes A, Vermes E, Levy F, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, Vincentelli A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1107724.

PMID: 36970355 PMC: 10036770. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1107724.


Deep learning estimation of three-dimensional left atrial shape from two-chamber and four-chamber cardiac long axis views.

Xu H, Williams S, Williams M, Newby D, Taylor J, Neji R Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 24(5):607-615.

PMID: 36725705 PMC: 10125223. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead010.


Standardization of normal values for cardiac chamber size in echocardiography.

Miyoshi T, Tanaka H J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021; 49(1):21-33.

PMID: 34787741 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-021-01147-6.


References
1.
Mor-Avi V, Yodwut C, Jenkins C, Kuhl H, Nesser H, Marwick T . Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: multicenter study for validation with CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5(8):769-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.05.011. View

2.
Yoshida C, Nakao S, Goda A, Naito Y, Matsumoto M, Otsuka M . Value of assessment of left atrial volume and diameter in patients with heart failure but with normal left ventricular ejection fraction and mitral flow velocity pattern. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008; 10(2):278-81. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen234. View

3.
Whitlock M, Garg A, Gelow J, Jacobson T, Broberg C . Comparison of left and right atrial volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using the area-length method. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106(9):1345-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.065. View

4.
Nistri S, Galderisi M, Ballo P, Olivotto I, DAndrea A, Pagliani L . Determinants of echocardiographic left atrial volume: implications for normalcy. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011; 12(11):826-33. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer137. View

5.
Kizer J, Bella J, Palmieri V, Liu J, Best L, Lee E . Left atrial diameter as an independent predictor of first clinical cardiovascular events in middle-aged and elderly adults: the Strong Heart Study (SHS). Am Heart J. 2006; 151(2):412-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.031. View