» Articles » PMID: 27690745

Within-session and One-week Practice Effects on a Motor Task in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Date 2016 Oct 4
PMID 27690745
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Practice effects on neuropsychological tests, which are improvements in test scores due to repeated exposure to testing materials, are robust in healthy elders, but muted in older adults with cognitive disorders. Conversely, few studies have investigated practice effects on motor tasks involving procedural memory, particularly across test-retest periods exceeding 24 hours. The current study examined one-week practice effects on a novel upper extremity motor task in 54 older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Results indicate that these individuals with primary memory deficits did improve on this motor task within a brief training session as well as across one week. These practice effects were unrelated to demographic characteristics or global cognition. One-week practice effects were, however, negatively related to delayed memory function, with larger practice effects being associated with poorer delayed memory and potentially better visuospatial ability. The presence of longer term practice effects on a procedural motor task not only has implications for how longitudinal assessments with similar measures involving implicit memory might be interpreted, but may also inform future rehabilitative strategies for patients with more severe declarative memory deficits.

Citing Articles

Reliability of the serial reaction time task: If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try again.

Oliveira C, Hayiou-Thomas M, Henderson L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 77(11):2256-2282.

PMID: 38311604 PMC: 11529135. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241232347.


Capturing learning curves with the multiday Boston Remote Assessment of Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH): Feasibility, reliability, and validity.

Weizenbaum E, Soberanes D, Hsieh S, Molinare C, Buckley R, Betensky R Neuropsychology. 2023; 38(2):198-210.

PMID: 37971862 PMC: 10841660. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000933.


Volumetric regional MRI and neuropsychological predictors of motor task variability in cognitively unimpaired, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and probable Alzheimer's disease older adults.

Malek-Ahmadi M, Duff K, Chen K, Su Y, King J, Koppelmans V Exp Gerontol. 2023; 173:112087.

PMID: 36639062 PMC: 9974847. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112087.


Rey-Osterrieth complex figure recall scores and motor skill learning in older adults: A non-linear mixed effect model-based analysis.

Wang P, Lingo VanGilder J, Schweighofer N, Schaefer S Hum Mov Sci. 2022; 86:103004.

PMID: 36191575 PMC: 11285843. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2022.103004.


A study on how concurrent visual feedback affects motor learning of adjustability of grasping force in younger and older adults.

Yamamoto R, Akizuki K, Yamaguchi K, Yabuki J, Kaneno T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):10755.

PMID: 35750894 PMC: 9232577. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14975-4.


References
1.
Duff K, Lyketsos C, Beglinger L, Chelune G, Moser D, Arndt S . Practice effects predict cognitive outcome in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011; 19(11):932-9. PMC: 3202689. DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318209dd3a. View

2.
Anguera J, Reuter-Lorenz P, Willingham D, Seidler R . Failure to engage spatial working memory contributes to age-related declines in visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(1):11-25. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21451. View

3.
OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View

4.
Schaefer S, Patterson C, Lang C . Transfer of training between distinct motor tasks after stroke: implications for task-specific approaches to upper-extremity neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 27(7):602-12. PMC: 3769167. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313481279. View

5.
Knopman D, Nissen M . Procedural learning is impaired in Huntington's disease: evidence from the serial reaction time task. Neuropsychologia. 1991; 29(3):245-54. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90085-m. View