» Articles » PMID: 33754890

Fluid Cognitive Abilities Are Important for Learning and Retention of a New, Explicitly Learned Walking Pattern in Individuals After Stroke

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2021 Mar 23
PMID 33754890
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is significant variability in poststroke locomotor learning that is poorly understood and affects individual responses to rehabilitation interventions. Cognitive abilities relate to upper extremity motor learning in neurologically intact adults, but have not been studied in poststroke locomotor learning.

Objective: To understand the relationship between locomotor learning and retention and cognition after stroke.

Methods: Participants with chronic (>6 months) stroke participated in 3 testing sessions. During the first session, participants walked on a treadmill and learned a new walking pattern through visual feedback about their step length. During the second session, participants walked on a treadmill and 24-hour retention was assessed. Physical and cognitive tests, including the Fugl-Meyer-Lower Extremity (FM-LE), Fluid Cognition Composite Score (FCCS) from the NIH Toolbox -Cognition Battery, and Spatial Addition from the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV, were completed in the third session. Two sequential regression models were completed: one with learning and one with retention as the dependent variables. Age, physical impairment (ie, FM-LE), and cognitive measures (ie, FCCS and Spatial Addition) were the independent variables.

Results: Forty-nine and 34 participants were included in the learning and retention models, respectively. After accounting for age and FM-LE, cognitive measures explained a significant portion of variability in learning ( = 0.17, = .008; overall model = 0.31, = .002) and retention (Δ = 0.17, = .023; overall model = 0.44, = .002).

Conclusions: Cognitive abilities appear to be an important factor for understanding locomotor learning and retention after stroke. This has significant implications for incorporating locomotor learning principles into the development of personalized rehabilitation interventions after stroke.

Citing Articles

Within-session propulsion asymmetry changes have a limited effect on gait asymmetry post-stroke.

Kettlety S, Finley J, Leech K J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):9.

PMID: 39844188 PMC: 11756213. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01553-8.


Within-session propulsion asymmetry changes have a limited effect on gait asymmetry post-stroke.

Kettlety S, Finley J, Leech K Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39764092 PMC: 11703335. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5053605/v1.


Blending motor learning approaches for short-term adjustments to gait in people with Parkinson disease.

Duppen C, Sachdeva N, Wrona H, Dayan E, Browner N, Lewek M Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(12):2853-2863.

PMID: 39361030 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06933-5.


Explicit and implicit locomotor learning in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Wood J, Thompson E, Wright H, Festa L, Morton S, Reisman D J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(4):1172-1182.

PMID: 39230337 PMC: 11495209. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00156.2024.


Visuospatial Skills Explain Differences in the Ability to Use Propulsion Biofeedback Post-stroke.

Kettlety S, Finley J, Leech K J Neurol Phys Ther. 2024; 48(4):207-216.

PMID: 38912856 PMC: 11424264. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000487.


References
1.
Harvey P . Domains of cognition and their assessment
. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019; 21(3):227-237. PMC: 6829170. DOI: 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/pharvey. View

2.
Anguera J, Reuter-Lorenz P, Willingham D, Seidler R . Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(9):1917-30. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21351. View

3.
Morton S, Bastian A . Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist. 2004; 10(3):247-59. DOI: 10.1177/1073858404263517. View

4.
Schmahmann J . The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett. 2018; 688:62-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005. View

5.
Kane M, Engle R . The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003; 9(4):637-71. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196323. View