» Articles » PMID: 27683574

Transcription Profiling Analysis of Mango-Fusarium Mangiferae Interaction

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2016 Sep 30
PMID 27683574
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Malformation caused by Fusarium mangiferae is one of the most destructive mango diseases affecting the canopy and floral development, leading to dramatic reduction in fruit yield. To further understand the mechanism of interaction between mango and F. mangiferae, we monitored the transcriptome profiles of buds from susceptible mango plants, which were challenged with F. mangiferae. More than 99 million reads were deduced by RNA-sequencing and were assembled into 121,267 unigenes. Based on the sequence similarity searches, 61,706 unigenes were identified, of which 21,273 and 50,410 were assigned to gene ontology categories and clusters of orthologous groups, respectively, and 33,243 were mapped to 119 KEGG pathways. The differentially expressed genes of mango were detected, having 15,830, 26,061, and 20,146 DEGs respectively, after infection for 45, 75, and 120 days. The analysis of the comparative transcriptome suggests that basic defense mechanisms play important roles in disease resistance. The data also show the transcriptional responses of interactions between mango and the pathogen and more drastic changes in the host transcriptome in response to the pathogen. These results could be used to develop new methods to broaden the resistance of mango to malformation, including the over-expression of key mango genes.

Citing Articles

Genome-Wide Analysis and Expression of () Family Genes under Cold Stress in Mango ().

Zhang Y, Li Y, Yang J, Yang X, Chen S, Xie Z Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36771676 PMC: 9920709. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030592.


Transcriptomics Analysis of Wheat Tassel Response to Kühn, Which Causes Common Bunt of Wheat.

He T, Ren Z, Muhae-Ud-Din G, Guo Q, Liu T, Chen W Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:823907.

PMID: 35273625 PMC: 8902468. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.823907.


Transcriptional differentiation driving Cucumis sativus-Botrytis cinerea interactions based on the Skellam model and Bayesian networks.

Zhang Q, Li K, Yang Y, Li B, Jiang L, He X AMB Express. 2021; 11(1):138.

PMID: 34669064 PMC: 8528924. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-021-01296-4.


Transcriptome analysis of wheat spikes in response to Tilletia controversa Kühn which cause wheat dwarf bunt.

Ren Z, Liu J, Muhae Ud Din G, Zhang H, Du Z, Chen W Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21567.

PMID: 33299089 PMC: 7725808. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78628-0.


Cyanide produced with ethylene by ACS and its incomplete detoxification by β-CAS in mango inflorescence leads to malformation.

Ansari M, Kaushik S, Bains G, Tula S, Joshi B, Rani V Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18361.

PMID: 31797981 PMC: 6892883. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54787-7.


References
1.
Li C, Shao J, Wang Y, Li W, Guo D, Yan B . Analysis of banana transcriptome and global gene expression profiles in banana roots in response to infection by race 1 and tropical race 4 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:851. PMC: 4046742. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-851. View

2.
Fujimoto S, Ohta M, Usui A, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M . Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive element binding factors act as transcriptional activators or repressors of GCC box-mediated gene expression. Plant Cell. 2000; 12(3):393-404. PMC: 139839. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.12.3.393. View

3.
Han Y, Zhang K, Yang J, Zhang N, Fang A, Zhang Y . Differential expression profiling of the early response to Ustilaginoidea virens between false smut resistant and susceptible rice varieties. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:955. PMC: 4647755. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2193-x. View

4.
Hasegawa M, Mitsuhara I, Seo S, Imai T, Koga J, Okada K . Phytoalexin accumulation in the interaction between rice and the blast fungus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010; 23(8):1000-11. DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-23-8-1000. View

5.
Marasas W, Ploetz R, Wingfield M, Wingfield B, Steenkamp E . Mango malformation disease and the associated fusarium species. Phytopathology. 2008; 96(6):667-72. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0667. View