» Articles » PMID: 27681898

Phage Inactivation of Listeria Monocytogenes on San Daniele Dry-Cured Ham and Elimination of Biofilms from Equipment and Working Environments

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2016 Sep 30
PMID 27681898
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The anti-listerial activity of generally recognized as safe (GRAS) bacteriophage Listex P100 (phage P100) was demonstrated in broths and on the surface of slices of dry-cured ham against 5 strains or serotypes (i.e., Scott A, 1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b) of Listeria monocytogenes. In a broth model system, phage P100 at a concentration equal to or greater than 7 log PFU/mL completely inhibited 2 log CFU/cm² or 3 log CFU/cm² of L. monocytogenes growth at 30 °C. The temperature (4, 10, 20 °C) seemed to influence P100 activity; the best results were obtained at 4 °C. On dry-cured ham slices, a P100 concentration ranging from 5 to 8 log PFU/cm² was required to obtain a significant reduction in L. monocytogenes. At 4, 10, and 20 °C, an inoculum of 8 log PFU/cm² was required to completely eliminate 2 log L. monocytogenes/cm² and to reach the absence in 25 g product according to USA food law. Conversely, it was impossible to completely eradicate L. monocytogenes with an inoculum of approximately of 3.0 and 4.0 log CFU/cm² and with a P100 inoculum ranging from 1 to 7 log PFU/cm². P100 remained stable on dry-cured ham slices over a 14-day storage period, with only a marginal loss of 0.2 log PFU/cm² from an initial phage treatment of approximately 8 log PFU/cm². Moreover, phage P100 eliminated free L. monocytogenes cells and biofilms on the machinery surfaces used for dry-cured ham production. These findings demonstrate that the GRAS bacteriophage Listex P100 at level of 8 log PFU/cm² is listericidal and useful for reducing the L. monocytogenes concentration or eradicating the bacteria from dry-cured ham.

Citing Articles

New Bacteriophage Phage Ka2 from a Tributary Stream of Lake Baikal.

Ilyina V, Gatina A, Trizna E, Siniagina M, Yadykova L, Ivannikova A Viruses. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006944 PMC: 11861027. DOI: 10.3390/v17020189.


Role of bacteriophages in shaping gut microbial community.

Mahmud M, Tamanna S, Akter S, Mazumder L, Akter S, Rakibul Hasan M Gut Microbes. 2024; 16(1):2390720.

PMID: 39167701 PMC: 11340752. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2390720.


Antimicrobial Resistance in Livestock: A Serious Threat to Public Health.

Bava R, Castagna F, Lupia C, Poerio G, Liguori G, Lombardi R Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38927217 PMC: 11200672. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13060551.


Phage Delivery Strategies for Biocontrolling Human, Animal, and Plant Bacterial Infections: State of the Art.

Vila M, Balcao L, Balcao V Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38543268 PMC: 10976114. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16030374.


Bacteriophages in Infectious Diseases and Beyond-A Narrative Review.

Ioannou P, Baliou S, Samonis G Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 37370331 PMC: 10295561. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12061012.


References
1.
Atterbury R, Connerton P, Dodd C, Rees C, Connerton I . Application of host-specific bacteriophages to the surface of chicken skin leads to a reduction in recovery of Campylobacter jejuni. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(10):6302-6. PMC: 201188. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6302-6306.2003. View

2.
Leverentz B, Conway W, Alavidze Z, Janisiewicz W, Fuchs Y, Camp M . Examination of bacteriophage as a biocontrol method for salmonella on fresh-cut fruit: a model study. J Food Prot. 2001; 64(8):1116-21. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.8.1116. View

3.
Bigwood T, Hudson J, Billington C, Carey-Smith G, Heinemann J . Phage inactivation of foodborne pathogens on cooked and raw meat. Food Microbiol. 2008; 25(2):400-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.11.003. View

4.
Guenther S, Loessner M . Bacteriophage biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes on soft ripened white mold and red-smear cheeses. Bacteriophage. 2012; 1(2):94-100. PMC: 3278646. DOI: 10.4161/bact.1.2.15662. View

5.
Tompkin R . Control of Listeria monocytogenes in the food-processing environment. J Food Prot. 2002; 65(4):709-25. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.4.709. View