» Articles » PMID: 27658922

Usefulness of the Atrial Emptying Fraction to Predict Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm After Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

Overview
Journal Am J Cardiol
Date 2016 Sep 24
PMID 27658922
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Atrial volumes indexed to body surface area (AVI) are robust predictors of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after direct current cardioversion (DCCV). The incremental value of atrial emptying fraction (EmF) compared with atrial volumes as a predictor for recurrent AF after DCCV has not been evaluated. We sought to compare the predictive ability of baseline left atrial (LA) EmF, right atrial (RA) EmF, LAVI, and RAVI for post-DCCV AF recurrence at 6 months. The first 95 patients enrolled in the AF Clinic Registry with adequate echocardiogram imaging constituted the study cohort. Each patient underwent echocardiogram within 6 months before cardioversion. Maximal LAVI and RAVI, LA EmF, and RA EmF were performed offline using 4-chamber single-plane Simpson's method, averaged over 5 cycles. The mean age of the study cohort was 64 ± 12 years, and 67% were men. Only 28 patients (29%) who underwent DCCV remained in sinus rhythm at 6 months of follow-up. The remaining, 67 (71%) had reverted to AF or underwent ablation during the 6 months of follow-up. The overall performance for prediction of AF recurrence was greatest for RA EmF, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC): RA EmF 0.92, LA EmF 0.89, RAVI 0.76, and LAVI 0.63. RA and LA EmF AUCs were significantly higher than for LAVI or RAVI (max p = 0.02). In conclusion, although RAVI and LAVI are strong predictors of AF recurrence after DCCV, RA and LA EmF outperformed in this cohort.

Citing Articles

Left atrial volume index: A predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following direct current cardioversion - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Raniga D, Goda M, Hattingh L, Thorning S, Rowe M, Howes L Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 51:101364.

PMID: 38426114 PMC: 10902144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101364.


Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Remodelling for the Prognosis of Maintaining Sinus Rhythm after Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Walek P, Roskal-Walek J, Dlubis P, Wozakowska-Kaplon B J Clin Med. 2023; 12(15).

PMID: 37568560 PMC: 10419596. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155158.


Left Atrial Wall Motion Velocity Assessed during Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Sinus Rhythm Maintenance after Electrical Cardioversion in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Walek P, Roskal-Walek J, Dlubis P, Tracz J, Wozakowska-Kaplon B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(23).

PMID: 36497585 PMC: 9740887. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315508.


Assessment of Bi-Ventricular and Bi-Atrial Areas Using Four-Chamber Cine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Fully Automated Segmentation with a U-Net Convolutional Neural Network.

Arai H, Kawakubo M, Sanui K, Iwamoto R, Nishimura H, Kadokami T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3).

PMID: 35162424 PMC: 8834677. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031401.


Mechanical concordance between left atrium and left atrial appendage in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: can it be exploited to avoid transesophageal echocardiography prior to electrical cardioversion during Covid-19 pandemic?.

Sonaglioni A, Lombardo M, Nicolosi G, Gensini G, Ambrosio G Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 38(2):351-362.

PMID: 34537932 PMC: 8449702. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02414-w.