» Articles » PMID: 38426114

Left Atrial Volume Index: A Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Direct Current Cardioversion - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 1
PMID 38426114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review and -analysis was conducted to determine the clinical relevance of echocardiographically measured left atrial (LA) size to predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after direct current cardioversion (DCCV). A search was performed on Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in Cochrane Library, Wiley and Web of Science (Clarivate) to identify relevant studies. Amongst the initial 4066 citations identified, 31 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the data analysis incorporating 2725 patients with a mean follow-up period of 6.5 months. The weighted mean left atrial volume index (LAVI) was 40.56 ml/m (95 %CI:37.24-43.88) in the sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance group versus 48.69 ml/m (95 % CI: 44.42-52.97) in the AF recurrence group with P value of < 0.001, left atrial diameter (LAD) was 42.06 mm (95 %CI: 41.08-43.05) in the SR maintenance group versus 45.13 mm (95 %CI: 44.09-46.16) in the AF recurrence group, P value < 0.001. Effect size analysis of LAVI showed that each unit increase in LAVI resulted in an increase in the risk of AF recurrence by 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-10 %). Age and AF duration were also statistically significant between the two groups however comorbidities, use of beta blockers or amiodarone were not significantly different. This -analysis shows that AF duration, LAVI, LAD and age predict the risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation post electrical cardioversion with LAVI being the most clinically relevant echocardiographic feature.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and risk factors associated with decompensated heart failure after successful elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

Healy C, Sodhi P, Barnett A, Hess T, Wright J Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 47:100480.

PMID: 39554978 PMC: 11566879. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100480.


Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Atrial Mechanics in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Electrical Cardioversion: A Systematic Review.

Sonaglioni A, Nicolosi G, Bruno A, Lombardo M, Muti P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518435 PMC: 11546254. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216296.


Recent highlights from the : Comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation.

Linz D, Dobrev D Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 53:101478.

PMID: 39175655 PMC: 11339049. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101478.

References
1.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

2.
Kim H, Lee J, Yoon H, Park H, Cho Y, Nam C . Association between Doppler flow of atrial fibrillatory contraction and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014; 27(10):1107-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.013. View

3.
Luong C, Thompson D, Bennett M, Gin K, Jue J, Barnes M . Right atrial volume is superior to left atrial volume for prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after direct current cardioversion. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 31(1):29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.10.009. View

4.
Naji F, Sabovic M . Lipoprotein(a) and inflammation in patients with atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. J Negat Results Biomed. 2011; 10:15. PMC: 3229463. DOI: 10.1186/1477-5751-10-15. View

5.
Roijer A, Meurling C, Eskilsson J, Olsson B . Left atrial appendage outflow velocity index is superior to conventional criteria for prediction of maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion. An echocardiographic study in patients with atrial fibrillation of a few months' duration. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2001; 35(2):119-24. DOI: 10.1080/140174301750164817. View