» Articles » PMID: 2764900

Isolation and Structural Analysis of Rat Gastric Mucus Glycoprotein Suggests a Homogeneous Protein Backbone

Overview
Journal Biochem J
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1989 Jun 15
PMID 2764900
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We isolated monomeric gastric mucus glycoprotein from the rat stomach by applying three successive CsCl-density-gradient steps in the continuous presence of guanidinium chloride. The rat gastric mucin was pure as compared with mucin isolated without the chaotropic reagent. In addition, the presence of guanidinium chloride resulted in a better preservation of the protein moiety. The purified mucin was fractionated according to buoyant density and chemically radiolabelled on tyrosine or cysteine residues and digested with specific proteinases. Analysis of mucin fractions of various densities gave identical peptide patterns, suggesting that the fractions contain a common protein backbone. Electron-microscopic images of the individual mucin molecules were recorded using rotary shadowing. They showed large filamentous molecules with a mean length of 208 nm that, after proteolytic digestion, yielded glycopeptides with a mean length of 149 nm. Heterogeneity in buoyant density and electrophoretic mobility is located in this large glycopeptide which remains after proteolytic digestion. Metabolic labelling of the mucin with [35 S]sulphate and [3H]galactose, followed by purification and proteolytic digestion, revealed that this glycopeptide accounts for most of the mass and contains relatively little protein, but probably all the oligosaccharides and sulphate. As this protein part is masked by the oligosaccharides, detailed study by the methods described was not possible. The results indicate that rat gastric mucin is homogeneous in a major part of the protein backbone and that the heterogeneity of the molecule originates most likely from differences in sulphate and/or sugar composition.

Citing Articles

Impact of Developmental Age, Necrotizing Enterocolitis Associated Stress, and Oral Therapeutic Intervention on Mucus Barrier Properties.

Lock J, Carlson T, Yu Y, Lu J, Claud E, Carrier R Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):6692.

PMID: 32317678 PMC: 7174379. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63593-5.


Mucus models to evaluate the diffusion of drugs and particles.

Lock J, Carlson T, Carrier R Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017; 124:34-49.

PMID: 29117512 PMC: 6463479. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.11.001.


Mucin-bacterial interactions in the human oral cavity and digestive tract.

Derrien M, van Passel M, van de Bovenkamp J, Schipper R, de Vos W, Dekker J Gut Microbes. 2011; 1(4):254-268.

PMID: 21327032 PMC: 3023607. DOI: 10.4161/gmic.1.4.12778.


Cloning and analysis of human gastric mucin cDNA reveals two types of conserved cysteine-rich domains.

Klomp L, Van Rens L, Strous G Biochem J. 1995; 308 ( Pt 3):831-8.

PMID: 8948439 PMC: 1136799. DOI: 10.1042/bj3080831.


Effect of proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, on expression of rat parietal cell specific carbohydrate antigen, type 2 chain N-acetyllactosamine.

Usumoto R, Okada Y, Tsuji T Dig Dis Sci. 1994; 39(1):169-76.

PMID: 8281853 DOI: 10.1007/BF02090078.


References
1.
Eckhardt A, Timpte C, ABERNETHY J, Toumadje A, Johnson Jr W, Hill R . Structural properties of porcine submaxillary gland apomucin. J Biol Chem. 1987; 262(23):11339-44. View

2.
Strous G, Kramer M . Isolation and partial characterization of rat gastric mucous glycoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980; 621(1):104-16. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(80)90066-5. View

3.
Laemmli U . Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680-5. DOI: 10.1038/227680a0. View

4.
Bonner W, Laskey R . A film detection method for tritium-labelled proteins and nucleic acids in polyacrylamide gels. Eur J Biochem. 1974; 46(1):83-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03599.x. View

5.
Rose M, Voter W, SAGE H, BROWN C, Kaufman B . Effects of deglycosylation on the architecture of ovine submaxillary mucin glycoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259(5):3167-72. View