» Articles » PMID: 27643895

Error Correction and the Structure of Inter-Trial Fluctuations in a Redundant Movement Task

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Sep 20
PMID 27643895
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We study inter-trial movement fluctuations exhibited by human participants during the repeated execution of a virtual shuffleboard task. Focusing on skilled performance, theoretical analysis of a previously-developed general model of inter-trial error correction is used to predict the temporal and geometric structure of variability near a goal equivalent manifold (GEM). The theory also predicts that the goal-level error scales linearly with intrinsic body-level noise via the total body-goal sensitivity, a new derived quantity that illustrates how task performance arises from the interaction of active error correction and passive sensitivity properties along the GEM. Linear models estimated from observed fluctuations, together with a novel application of bootstrapping to the estimation of dynamical and correlation properties of the inter-trial dynamics, are used to experimentally confirm all predictions, thus validating our model. In addition, we show that, unlike "static" variability analyses, our dynamical approach yields results that are independent of the coordinates used to measure task execution and, in so doing, provides a new set of task coordinates that are intrinsic to the error-regulation process itself.

Citing Articles

A model of task-level human stepping regulation yields semistable walking.

Patil N, Dingwell J, Cusumano J J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(219):20240151.

PMID: 39379002 PMC: 11461082. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0151.


A model of task-level human stepping regulation yields semistable walking.

Patil N, Dingwell J, Cusumano J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38979349 PMC: 11230222. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.05.583616.


Reinforcement-based processes actively regulate motor exploration along redundant solution manifolds.

Roth A, Calalo J, Lokesh R, Sullivan S, Grill S, Jeka J Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2009):20231475.

PMID: 37848061 PMC: 10581769. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1475.


Neuromuscular control: from a biomechanist's perspective.

Mulla D, Keir P Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1217009.

PMID: 37476161 PMC: 10355330. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1217009.


Adaptive multi-objective control explains how humans make lateral maneuvers while walking.

Desmet D, Cusumano J, Dingwell J PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(11):e1010035.

PMID: 36374914 PMC: 9704766. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010035.


References
1.
Gao J, Hu J, Tung W, Cao Y, Sarshar N, Roychowdhury V . Assessment of long-range correlation in time series: how to avoid pitfalls. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006; 73(1 Pt 2):016117. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016117. View

2.
Todorov E, Jordan M . Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(11):1226-35. DOI: 10.1038/nn963. View

3.
van Beers R . Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron. 2009; 63(3):406-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025. View

4.
Kang N, Shinohara M, Zatsiorsky V, Latash M . Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 157(3):336-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1850-0. View

5.
Kirchner M, Schubert P, Liebherr M, Haas C . Detrended fluctuation analysis and adaptive fractal analysis of stride time data in Parkinson's disease: stitching together short gait trials. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e85787. PMC: 3900445. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085787. View