» Articles » PMID: 27642252

Determining Transformation Distance in Similarity: Considerations for Assessing Representational Changes a Priori

Overview
Journal Think Reason
Date 2016 Sep 20
PMID 27642252
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Representational Distortion (RD) approach to similarity (e.g., Hahn, Chater, & Richardson, 2003) proposes that similarity is computed using the transformation distance between two entities. We argue that researchers who adopt this approach need to be concerned with how representational transformations can be determined a priori. We discuss several roadblocks to using this approach. Specifically, we demonstrate the difficulties inherent in determining what transformations are psychologically salient and the importance of considering the directionality of transformations.

References
1.
Biederman I . Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev. 1987; 94(2):115-147. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115. View

2.
Goldstone R, Medin D, Gentner D . Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments. Cogn Psychol. 1991; 23(2):222-62. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90010-l. View

3.
Love B, Markman A . The nonindependence of stimulus properties in human category learning. Mem Cognit. 2003; 31(5):790-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196117. View

4.
Larkey L, Markman A . Processes of similarity judgment. Cogn Sci. 2011; 29(6):1061-76. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_30. View

5.
GOLDMEIER E . Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychol Issues. 1972; 8(1):1-136. View