» Articles » PMID: 27627049

Predictive Time-series Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks for Linac Beam Symmetry: an Empirical Study

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Sep 15
PMID 27627049
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over half of cancer patients receive radiotherapy (RT) as partial or full cancer treatment. Daily quality assurance (QA) of RT in cancer treatment closely monitors the performance of the medical linear accelerator (Linac) and is critical for continuous improvement of patient safety and quality of care. Cumulative longitudinal QA measurements are valuable for understanding the behavior of the Linac and allow physicists to identify trends in the output and take preventive actions. In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) time-series prediction modeling techniques were both applied to 5-year daily Linac QA data. Verification tests and other evaluations were then performed for all models. Preliminary results showed that ANN time-series predictive modeling has more advantages over ARMA techniques for accurate and effective applicability in the dosimetry and QA field.

Citing Articles

MR-linac: role of artificial intelligence and automation.

Psoroulas S, Paunoiu A, Corradini S, Horner-Rieber J, Tanadini-Lang S Strahlenther Onkol. 2025; 201(3):298-305.

PMID: 39843783 PMC: 11839841. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02358-9.


An overview of artificial intelligence in medical physics and radiation oncology.

Liu J, Xiao H, Fan J, Hu W, Yang Y, Dong P J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 3(3):211-221.

PMID: 39035195 PMC: 11256546. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.08.002.


A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy.

Shan G, Yu S, Lai Z, Xuan Z, Zhang J, Wang B Dose Response. 2024; 22(2):15593258241263687.

PMID: 38912333 PMC: 11193352. DOI: 10.1177/15593258241263687.


Applications of artificial intelligence for machine- and patient-specific quality assurance in radiation therapy: current status and future directions.

Ono T, Iramina H, Hirashima H, Adachi T, Nakamura M, Mizowaki T J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(4):421-432.

PMID: 38798135 PMC: 11262865. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae033.


Using Artificial Intelligence for Optimization of the Processes and Resource Utilization in Radiotherapy.

Krishnamurthy R, Mummudi N, Goda J, Chopra S, Heijmen B, Swamidas J JCO Glob Oncol. 2022; 8:e2100393.

PMID: 36395438 PMC: 10166445. DOI: 10.1200/GO.21.00393.


References
1.
Hunt M, Pastrana G, Amols H, Killen A, Alektiar K . The impact of new technologies on radiation oncology events and trends in the past decade: an institutional experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(4):925-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.042. View

2.
Valdes G, Scheuermann R, Hung C, Olszanski A, Bellerive M, Solberg T . A mathematical framework for virtual IMRT QA using machine learning. Med Phys. 2016; 43(7):4323. DOI: 10.1118/1.4953835. View

3.
Grattan M, Hounsell A . Analysis of output trends from Varian 2100C/D and 600C/D accelerators. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 56(1):N11-9. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/1/N02. View

4.
Ishikura S . Quality assurance of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: toward improvement of patient safety and quality of care. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008; 38(11):723-9. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyn112. View

5.
Taskaya-Temizel T, Casey M . A comparative study of autoregressive neural network hybrids. Neural Netw. 2005; 18(5-6):781-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.06.003. View