Analysis of Output Trends from Varian 2100C/D and 600C/D Accelerators
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Analysis of Varian linear accelerator output trends is reported. Two groups, consisting of four matched Varian 2100C/D and four matched Varian 600C/D accelerators, with different designs of monitor chamber, have been investigated and the data acquired from regular calibrated ion chamber/electrometer measurements of the output performance of the eight accelerators analysed. The trend of machine output with time, having removed the effect of adjusting the monitor chamber response, was compared on a monthly and annual basis for monitor chambers with ages ranging between 1 year and 7 years. The results indicate that the response is generally consistent within each set of accelerators with different monitor chamber designs. Those used in a Varian 600C/D machine result in a reduction in measured output over time, with an average monthly reduction of 0.35 ± 0.09% over the course of the first 4 years of use. The chambers used in a 2100C/D accelerator result in an increase in measured output over time, with an average monthly increase of 0.26 ± 0.09% over the course of the first 4 years of use. The output increase then reduces towards the end of this period of time, with the average monthly change falling to -0.03 ± 0.02% for the following 3 years. The output response trend was similar for all clinical energies used on the 2100C/D accelerators--6, 15 MV x-ray beams, and 4, 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV electron beams. By tracking these changes it has been possible to predict the response over time to allow appropriate adjustments in monitor chamber response to maintain a measured accelerator output within tolerance and give confidence in performance. It has also provided data to indicate the need for planned preventative intervention and indicate if the monitor chamber response is behaving as expected.
Lyatskaya Y, Killoran J, Kukluk J, Cormack R, Quirk S Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 9(5):101469.
PMID: 38550367 PMC: 10972807. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101469.
Srivastava S, Sorensen S, Jani S, Yan X, Pinnaduwage D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 24(3):e13857.
PMID: 36519493 PMC: 10018673. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13857.
The lifetime of a linac monitor unit ion chamber.
Cetnar A, DiCostanzo D J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(12):108-114.
PMID: 34762336 PMC: 8664141. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13463.
Bolt M, Clark C, Nisbet A, Chen T Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 19:33-38.
PMID: 34307916 PMC: 8295844. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.06.004.
Pearson M, Eaton D, Greener T J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(8):224-235.
PMID: 32790139 PMC: 7484877. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12950.