» Articles » PMID: 27623949

Introduction of a New Electronic Medical Record System Has Mixed Effects on First Surgical Case Efficiency Metrics

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Sep 15
PMID 27623949
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate the effect of deploying a new electronic medical record (EMR) system on first case starts in the operating room. Data on first case start times were collected after implementation of a new EMR (Epic) from June 2015 to May 2016, which replaced a legacy system of both paper and electronic records. These were compared to data from the same months in the three proceeding years. First patient in room (FPIR) on time was true if the patient was in operating room before 7:35 AM (or 9:35 AM on Wednesdays) and first case on time start (FCOTS) was true if completion of anesthetic induction was less than 20 min after the patient entered the operating room (or 35 min for cardiac and neurosurgery). Times beyond these cutoffs were quantified as FPIR and FCOTS delays in minutes. Average delays were compared by month with two-sample t tests and 95 % confidence intervals. There was a significant increase in FPIR delays in the first month (11.07 vs. 3.47 min, p < 0.0001), which abated by the fifth month. Post-implementation FCOTS delays improved by the third month (4.53 vs. 7.10 min, p < 0.0001). Both results persisted throughout the study. First month FPIR delays were not limited to any one specialty. EMRs have the potential to improve hospital workflows, but are not without learning curves. FPIR and FCOTS delays return to baseline after a few months, and in the case of FCOTS, can improve beyond baseline.

Citing Articles

Which Electronic Health Record System Should We Use? A Systematic Review.

Al Ani M, Garas G, Hollingshead J, Cheetham D, Athanasiou T, Patel V Med Princ Pract. 2022; 31(4):342-351.

PMID: 35584616 PMC: 9485928. DOI: 10.1159/000525135.


Effect of the Implementation of a New Electronic Health Record System on Surgical Case Turnover Time.

McDowell J, Wu A, Ehrenfeld J, Urman R J Med Syst. 2017; 41(3):42.

PMID: 28130725 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0690-y.

References
1.
Chen Y, Gabriel R, Kodali B, Urman R . Effect of Anesthesia Staffing Ratio on First-Case Surgical Start Time. J Med Syst. 2016; 40(5):115. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0471-z. View

2.
Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S, Smith K . Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998; 280(15):1339-46. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1339. View

3.
Malapero R, Gabriel R, Gimlich R, Ehrenfeld J, Philip B, Bates D . An anesthesia medication cost scorecard--concepts for individualized feedback. J Med Syst. 2015; 39(5):48. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-015-0226-2. View

4.
Feldstein A, Elmer P, Smith D, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C . Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54(3):450-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00618.x. View

5.
Gordon T, Paul S, Lyles A, Fountain J . Surgical unit time utilization review: resource utilization and management implications. J Med Syst. 1988; 12(3):169-79. DOI: 10.1007/BF00996639. View