» Articles » PMID: 25732076

An Anesthesia Medication Cost Scorecard--concepts for Individualized Feedback

Overview
Journal J Med Syst
Date 2015 Mar 4
PMID 25732076
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a growing emphasis on both cost containment and better quality health care. The creation of better methods for alerting providers and their departments to the costs associated with patient care is one tool for improving efficiency. Since anesthetic medications used in the OR setting are one easily monitored factor contributing to OR costs, anesthetic cost report cards can be used to assess the cost and, potentially the quality of care provided by each practitioner. An ongoing challenge is the identification of the most effective strategies to control costs, promote cost awareness and at the same time maximize quality. To test the scorecard concept, we utilized existing informatics systems to gather and analyze drug costs for anesthesia providers in the OR. Drug costs were analyzed by medication class for each provider. Individual anesthesiologist's anesthetic costs were collected and compared to the average costs of the overall group and individual trends over time were noted. We presented drug usage data in an electronic report card format. Real-time individual reports can be provided to anesthesiologists to allow for anesthetic cost feedback. Data provided can include number of cases, average case time, total anesthetic medication costs, and average anesthetic cost per case. Also included can be subcategories of pre-medication, antibiotics, hypnotics, local anesthetics, neuromuscular blocking drugs, analgesics, vasopressors, beta-blockers, anti-emetics, volatile anesthetics, and reversal agents. The concept of anesthetic cost report card should be further developed for individual feedback, and could include many other dimensions. Such a report card can be utilized to encourage lower anesthetic costs, quality improvement among anesthesia providers, and for cost containment in the operating room.

Citing Articles

Dashboard of Short-Term Postoperative Patient Outcomes for Anesthesiologists: Development and Preliminary Evaluation.

Sreepada R, Chang A, West N, Sujan J, Lai B, Poznikoff A JMIR Perioper Med. 2023; 6:e47398.

PMID: 37725426 PMC: 10548316. DOI: 10.2196/47398.


Operating Room Efficiency before and after Entrance in a Benchmarking Program for Surgical Process Data.

Pedron S, Winter V, Oppel E, Bialas E J Med Syst. 2017; 41(10):151.

PMID: 28836055 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0798-0.


Introduction of a new electronic medical record system has mixed effects on first surgical case efficiency metrics.

Wu A, Kodali B, Flanagan Jr H, Urman R J Clin Monit Comput. 2016; 31(5):1073-1079.

PMID: 27623949 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9933-6.


Effect of Anesthesia Staffing Ratio on First-Case Surgical Start Time.

Chen Y, Gabriel R, Kodali B, Urman R J Med Syst. 2016; 40(5):115.

PMID: 26995356 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0471-z.


The Impact of Overestimations of Surgical Control Times Across Multiple Specialties on Medical Systems.

Wu A, Brovman E, Whang E, Ehrenfeld J, Urman R J Med Syst. 2016; 40(4):95.

PMID: 26860918 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0457-x.


References
1.
Srigley J, Gardam M, Fernie G, Lightfoot D, Lebovic G, Muller M . Hand hygiene monitoring technology: a systematic review of efficacy. J Hosp Infect. 2014; 89(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.10.005. View

2.
Peccora C, Gimlich R, Cornell R, Vacanti C, Ehrenfeld J, Urman R . Anesthesia report card - a customizable tool for performance improvement. J Med Syst. 2014; 38(9):105. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-014-0105-2. View

3.
Hysong S . Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care. 2009; 47(3):356-63. PMC: 4170834. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181893f6b. View

4.
Kaye A, Okanlawon O, Urman R . Clinical performance feedback and quality improvement opportunities for perioperative physicians. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014; 5:115-23. PMC: 4014376. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S62165. View

5.
Heidegger T, Husemann Y, Nuebling M, Morf D, Sieber T, Huth A . Patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care: development of a psychometric questionnaire and benchmarking among six hospitals in Switzerland and Austria. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89(6):863-72. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aef277. View