» Articles » PMID: 27612500

Home Use of Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Suboptimally Controlled Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A 3-Week, Free-Living, Randomized Crossover Trial

Overview
Journal Diabetes Care
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 Sep 11
PMID 27612500
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in adolescents with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions.

Research Design And Methods: In an open-label randomized crossover study, 12 suboptimally controlled adolescents on insulin pump therapy (mean ± SD age 14.6 ± 3.1 years; HbA 69 ± 8 mmol/mol [8.5 ± 0.7%]; duration of diabetes 7.8 ± 3.5 years) underwent two 21-day periods in which hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery was compared with sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy in random order. During the closed-loop intervention, a model predictive algorithm automatically directed insulin delivery between meals and overnight. Participants used a bolus calculator to administer prandial boluses.

Results: The proportion of time that sensor glucose was in the target range (3.9-10 mmol/L; primary end point) was increased during the closed-loop intervention compared with sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy by 18.8 ± 9.8 percentage points (mean ± SD; P < 0.001), the mean sensor glucose level was reduced by 1.8 ± 1.3 mmol/L (P = 0.001), and the time spent above target was reduced by 19.3 ± 11.3 percentage points (P < 0.001). The time spent with sensor glucose levels below 3.9 mmol/L was low and comparable between interventions (median difference 0.4 [interquartile range -2.2 to 1.3] percentage points; P = 0.33). Improved glucose control during closed-loop was associated with increased variability of basal insulin delivery (P < 0.001) and an increase in the total daily insulin dose (53.5 [39.5-72.1] vs. 51.5 [37.6-64.3] units/day; P = 0.006). Participants expressed positive attitudes and experience with the closed-loop system.

Conclusions: Free-living home use of day-and-night closed-loop in suboptimally controlled adolescents with type 1 diabetes is safe, feasible, and improves glucose control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. Larger and longer studies are warranted.

Citing Articles

Experiences of People With Type 1 Diabetes Using the iLet Bionic Pancreas in Primary Care: A Qualitative Analysis.

Oser C, Parascando J, Kostiuk M, Nagel K, Oser S, Huss K Clin Diabetes. 2025; 43(1):109-122.

PMID: 39829692 PMC: 11739349. DOI: 10.2337/cd24-0060.


Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling.

Asgharzadeh A, Patel M, Connock M, Damery S, Ghosh I, Jordan M Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(80):1-190.

PMID: 39673446 PMC: 11664472. DOI: 10.3310/JYPL3536.


Three months use of Hybrid Closed Loop Systems improves glycated hemoglobin levels in adolescents and children with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis.

Wang Y, Ying H, Tian F, Qian X, Zhou Z PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308202.

PMID: 39133688 PMC: 11318905. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308202.


Parent, child, and adolescent lived experience using the insulin-only iLet Bionic Pancreas.

Howard K, Garza K, Feldman M, Weissberg-Benchell J J Pediatr Psychol. 2024; 49(6):413-420.

PMID: 38591792 PMC: 11175587. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae022.


Efficacy and safety of closed-loop control system for type one diabetes in adolescents a meta analysis.

Jabari M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13165.

PMID: 37574494 PMC: 10423718. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40423-y.


References
1.
Bergenstal R, Klonoff D, Garg S, Bode B, Meredith M, Slover R . Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(3):224-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303576. View

2.
Miller K, Foster N, Beck R, Bergenstal R, DuBose S, DiMeglio L . Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(6):971-8. DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0078. View

3.
Blauw H, van Bon A, Koops R, DeVries J . Performance and safety of an integrated bihormonal artificial pancreas for fully automated glucose control at home. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016; 18(7):671-7. PMC: 5111773. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12663. View

4.
Russell S, Hillard M, Balliro C, Magyar K, Selagamsetty R, Sinha M . Day and night glycaemic control with a bionic pancreas versus conventional insulin pump therapy in preadolescent children with type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016; 4(3):233-243. PMC: 4799495. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00489-1. View

5.
Buckingham B, Raghinaru D, Cameron F, Bequette B, Peter Chase H, Maahs D . Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(7):1197-204. PMC: 4477332. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-3053. View