» Articles » PMID: 27606671

Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Sep 9
PMID 27606671
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.

Citing Articles

Is This a Helpful YouTube Video? A Research-Based Framework for Evaluating and Developing Conceptual Chemistry Instructional Videos.

Herrington D, Sweeder R J Chem Educ. 2025; 102(2):621-629.

PMID: 39958395 PMC: 11823403. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01085.


Increasing Authenticity of the Laboratory through the MICRO Project: Analysis of Analytical Chemistry Laboratory Experiments for Their Level of Inquiry.

Van Wyk A, Frederick K, Lieberman M, Cole R J Chem Educ. 2025; 102(1):3-14.

PMID: 39830410 PMC: 11736796. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00945.


Identifying factors associated with instructor implementation of three-dimensional assessment in undergraduate biology courses.

Uminski C, Couch B PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312252.

PMID: 39436884 PMC: 11495598. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312252.


Examining and Supporting Mechanistic Explanations Across Chemistry and Biology Courses.

Shiroda M, Franovic C, de Lima J, Noyes K, Babi D, Beltran-Flores E CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024; 23(3):ar38.

PMID: 39172965 PMC: 11440742. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.23-08-0157.


Beyond active learning: Using 3-Dimensional learning to create scientifically authentic, student-centered classrooms.

Cooper M, Caballero M, Carmel J, Duffy E, Ebert-May D, Fata-Hartley C PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0295887.

PMID: 38820334 PMC: 11142574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295887.


References
1.
Momsen J, Offerdahl E, Kryjevskaia M, Montplaisir L, Anderson E, Grosz N . Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013; 12(2):239-49. PMC: 3671651. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-08-0130. View

2.
Wood W . Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009; 25:93-112. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175306. View

3.
Zheng A, Lawhorn J, Lumley T, Freeman S . Assessment. Application of Bloom's taxonomy debunks the "MCAT myth". Science. 2008; 319(5862):414-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1147852. View

4.
Cooper M, Caballero M, Ebert-May D, Fata-Hartley C, Jardeleza S, Krajcik J . Challenge faculty to transform STEM learning. Science. 2015; 350(6258):281-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.aab0933. View

5.
Stanger-Hall K . Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012; 11(3):294-306. PMC: 3433302. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.11-11-0100. View