» Articles » PMID: 27583005

Acromial and Scapular Spine Fractures After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Shoulder Elbow
Date 2016 Sep 2
PMID 27583005
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty occur predominantly as a result of bony insufficiency secondary to patient and intra-operative technical factors. The spectrum of the pathology can range from a stress reaction to an undisplaced or displaced fracture. Prompt diagnosis of these fractures requires a high suspicion in the postoperative patient with a clinical presentation of acute onset of pain along the acromion or scapular spine and/or deterioration of shoulder function. Conventional shoulder radiographs are frequently unreliable in identifying these fractures, especially if they are undisplaced. Computed tomography (CT) and/or single photon emission computed tomography/CT scans are useful imaging modalities for obtaining a definitive diagnosis. Early diagnosis and non-operative treatment of a stress reaction or undisplaced fracture is essential for preventing further displacement and potential disability. The management of displaced fractures is challenging for the orthopaedic surgeon as a result of high rates of mal-union or non-union, decreased functional outcomes, and variable results after open reduction and internal fixation. Strategies for preventing these fractures include optimizing the patient's bone health, correct glenoid baseplate screw length and position, and avoiding excessive deltoid tension. Further research is required to identify the specific patient and fracture characteristics that will benefit from conservative versus operative management.

Citing Articles

Acromion and Clavicle Stress Fractures After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Reflect Failure to Address Osteoporosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Cronin J, Curtis K, Richards B, Hibbard J, Skedros J Cureus. 2025; 17(3):e79993.

PMID: 40041247 PMC: 11876088. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79993.


Anatomic versus reverse shoulder replacement: Are we asking the right questions and what are the answers?.

Leinweber K, Bowler A, Diestel D, McDonald-Stahl M, Le K, Kirsch J J Hand Microsurg. 2025; 17(3):100225.

PMID: 40007762 PMC: 11849629. DOI: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100225.


The acetabularization index: a novel measure of acromial bone loss prior to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Shekhbihi A, Moroder P, Abdalla A, Reichert W, Scheibel M, Masoud M Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(8):4019-4026.

PMID: 39302446 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04102-6.


Biomechanical comparison of single versus double plate osteosynthesis in acromion type III fractures.

Pastor M, Nebel D, Degering A, Smith T, Karkosch R, Horstmann H Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024; 16:88396.

PMID: 38765296 PMC: 10770366. DOI: 10.52965/001c.88396.


Acromial stress fracture after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a case report.

Kazemi N JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024; 4(2):266-271.

PMID: 38706669 PMC: 11065731. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.01.005.


References
1.
Hoenig M, Loeffler B, Brown S, Peindl R, Fleischli J, Connor P . Reverse glenoid component fixation: is a posterior screw necessary?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(4):544-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.006. View

2.
Anakwenze O, Kancherla V, Carolan G, Abboud J . Coracoid fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a report of 2 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015; 44(11):E469-72. View

3.
Stevens C, Murphy M, Stevens T, Bryant T, Wright T . Bilateral scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 24(2):e50-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.045. View

4.
Saltzman B, Chalmers P, Gupta A, Romeo A, Nicholson G . Complication rates comparing primary with revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(11):1647-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.015. View

5.
Hattrup S . The influence of postoperative acromial and scapular spine fractures on the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(5). DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100329-04. View