» Articles » PMID: 27562584

Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Foreword to the Special Issue

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Aug 27
PMID 27562584
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Employer policies and practices have been shown to impact workplace disability, but research in this area has waned in recent years despite an aging workforce, a growing prevalence of chronic health conditions, and a larger proportion of working-age adults on permanent work disability in many jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to describe the background rationale and methodology for an invited conference designed to improve research of employer strategies to curtail work disability. Methods A multidisciplinary team of 26 international researchers with published research in employer-based disability management or related fields were invited to attend a 3-day conference in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The overall goal was to review the status of current research of workplace disability management and prevention, examine its relevance for employer decision-making, compare conceptual frameworks or theoretical perspectives, and recommend future research directions. Working groups were organized and draft manuscripts were prepared in advance. Conference activities included working group presentations and critiques, discussions with a panel of industry consultants and advisors, group interaction and debate, generation of final recommendations, and manuscript revision. Results/Conclusion Six principal domains were established with respect to future research: (a) further elucidation of the key workplace factors that buffer the disabling effects of injury and illness; (b) more innovative and feasible options for workplace intervention; (c) measurement of workplace-relevant disability outcomes; (d) a stronger theoretical framework for understanding the factors behind employer uptake and implementation; (e) a focus on special clinical populations and occupations where disability risk is most troubling; and (f) better representation of workers and employers that reflect the diverse and changing nature of work. Final comments and recommendations of the working groups are presented in the following six articles in this special issue of the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. Conference attendees recommended changes in methodology, collaboration strategies, and theoretical perspectives to improve the practical and scientific impact of future research of employer practices.

Citing Articles

Implemented disability-related policies and practices and sustained employment of partially disabled employees: evidence from linked survey and register data.

van Ooijen R, Koning P, Boot C, Brouwer S Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024; 50(6):437-446.

PMID: 38874551 PMC: 11391366. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4168.


Social and health care top managers' perceptions and aims of strategic work ability management in the midst of change.

Anttilainen J, Pehkonen I, Savinainen M, Haukka E Work. 2023; 77(2):533-545.

PMID: 37742684 PMC: 10894579. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230034.


Assessing Continued Employability among People with Mental Illnesses: Development of a Scale in Japan.

Fukuura Y, Shigematsu Y, Mizuochi Y, Kakuma T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429523 PMC: 9690244. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214786.


Exploring Employer Perspectives on Their Supportive Role in Accommodating Workers with Disabilities to Promote Sustainable RTW: A Qualitative Study.

Jansen J, Boot C, Alma M, Brouwer S J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 32(1):1-12.

PMID: 35166974 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-10019-2.


The Role of the Employer in Supporting Work Participation of Workers with Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review Using an Interdisciplinary Approach.

Jansen J, van Ooijen R, Koning P, Boot C, Brouwer S J Occup Rehabil. 2021; 31(4):916-949.

PMID: 33978875 PMC: 8558169. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-09978-3.


References
1.
Alonso J, Vilagut G, Adroher N, Chatterji S, He Y, Andrade L . Disability mediates the impact of common conditions on perceived health. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e65858. PMC: 3675077. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065858. View

2.
Main C, Nicholas M, Shaw W, Tetrick L, Ehrhart M, Pransky G . Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs. J Occup Rehabil. 2016; 26(4):448-464. PMC: 5104783. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9677-7. View

3.
Young A, Viikari-Juntura E, Boot C, Chan C, de Porras D, Linton S . Erratum to: Workplace Outcomes in Work-Disability Prevention Research: A Review with Recommendations for Future Research. J Occup Rehabil. 2016; 27(2):306. PMC: 6828466. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9686-6. View

4.
Franche R, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P . Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15(4):525-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-8032-1. View

5.
Anema J, Schellart A, Cassidy J, Loisel P, Veerman T, van der Beek A . Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009; 19(4):419-26. PMC: 2775112. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9202-3. View