» Articles » PMID: 27614465

Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives: A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Sep 12
PMID 27614465
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose The significant individual and societal burden of work disability could be reduced if supportive workplace strategies could be added to evidence-based clinical treatment and rehabilitation to improve return-to-work (RTW) and other disability outcomes. The goal of this article is to summarize existing research on workplace interventions to prevent disability, relate these to employer disability management practices, and recommend future research priorities. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that ultimately led to an invited 3-day conference, Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability, held October 14-16, 2015, in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with an expert panel with direct employer experience. Results Evidence from randomized trials and other research designs has shown general support for job modification, RTW coordination, and organizational support, but evidence is still lacking for interventions at a more granular level. Grey literature reports focused mainly on job re-design and work organization. Panel feedback focused on organizational readiness and the beliefs and values of senior managers as critical factors in facilitating changes to disability management practices. While the scientific literature is focused on facilitating improved coping and reducing discomforts for individual workers, the employer-directed grey literature is focused on making group-level changes to policies and procedures. Conclusions Future research might better target employer practices by tying interventions to positive workplace influences and determinants, by developing more participatory interventions and research designs, and by designing interventions that address factors of organizational change.

Citing Articles

Assisting Employers of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) to Support Employees on Long-Term Sick-Leave: Development of a Web-Based SME Tool Using Intervention Mapping.

Beerda D, Schaafsma F, Tamminga S, de Wind A, de Rijk A, Greidanus M J Occup Rehabil. 2025; .

PMID: 40089654 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-025-10281-8.


Rehabilitation coordinator - managers' experiences of a new function in health care.

Strid C, Benner R, Stefansdotter R, Stigmar K BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1371.

PMID: 39522016 PMC: 11549758. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11856-6.


Resuming work roles after injury in a low-income context: Multiple factors influencing the return to work outcomes.

Ahmed A, Finlayson M, Addissie A, Zewdie A, Lysaght R PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0308816.

PMID: 39441811 PMC: 11498707. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308816.


Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process.

Klevanger N, Aasdahl L, Rise M PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284369.

PMID: 37058510 PMC: 10104318. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284369.


Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zetterberg H, Owiredua C, Asenlof P, Lennartsson R, Brodda Jansen G, Boersma K J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 33(2):316-328.

PMID: 36308628 PMC: 9617527. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10074-3.


References
1.
Hees H, Koeter M, de Vries G, Ooteman W, Schene A . Effectiveness of adjuvant occupational therapy in employees with depression: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:558. PMC: 2946299. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-558. View

2.
Anema J, Steenstra I, Urlings I, Bongers P, de Vroome E, van Mechelen W . Participatory ergonomics as a return-to-work intervention: a future challenge?. Am J Ind Med. 2003; 44(3):273-81. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10259. View

3.
B Jensen I, Bergstrom G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L . A 3-year follow-up of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme for back and neck pain. Pain. 2005; 115(3):273-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.005. View

4.
Vlasveld M, Anema J, Beekman A, van Mechelen W, Hoedeman R, van Marwijk H . Multidisciplinary collaborative care for depressive disorder in the occupational health setting: design of a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:99. PMC: 2390533. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-99. View

5.
Driessen M, Proper K, Anema J, Knol D, Bongers P, van der Beek A . Participatory ergonomics to reduce exposure to psychosocial and physical risk factors for low back pain and neck pain: results of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2010; 68(9):674-81. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.056739. View