» Articles » PMID: 27548532

Identification of Discrete Epitopes of Ro52p200 and Association with Fetal Cardiac Conduction System Manifestations in a Rodent Model

Overview
Date 2016 Aug 23
PMID 27548532
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Congenital heart block (CHB) is a potentially lethal condition characterized by a third-degree atrioventricular block (AVB). Despite anti-Ro52 antibodies being detected in nearly 90% of mothers of affected children, CHB occurs in only 1-2% of anti-Ro/Sjögren's-syndrome-related antigen A (SSA) autoantibody-positive pregnancies. Maternal antibodies have been suggested to bind molecules crucial to fetal cardiac function; however, it remains unknown whether a single antibody profile associates with CHB or whether several specificities and cross-reactive targets exist. Here, we aimed to define further the reactivity profile of CHB-associated antibodies towards Ro52p200 (amino acid 200-239). We first analysed reactivity of a monoclonal anti-Ro52 antibody shown to induce AVB in rats (7.8C7) and of sera from anti-Ro52p200 antibody-positive mothers of children with CHB towards a panel of modified Ro52p200 peptides, and subsequently evaluated their potential to induce AVB in rats upon transfer during gestation. We observed that CHB maternal sera displayed a homogeneous reactivity profile targeting preferentially the C-terminal part of Ro52p200, in contrast to 7.8C7 that specifically bound the p200 N-terminal end. In particular, amino acid D233 appeared crucial to maternal antibody reactivity towards p200. Despite low to absent reactivity towards rat p200 and different binding profiles towards mutated rat peptides indicating recognition of different epitopes within Ro52p200, immunoglobulin (Ig)G purified from two mothers of children with CHB could induce AVB in rats. Our findings support the hypothesis that several fine antibody specificities and cross-targets may exist and contribute to CHB development in anti-Ro52 antibody-positive pregnancies.

Citing Articles

First Report of the Italian Registry on Immune-Mediated Congenital Heart Block (Lu.Ne Registry).

Fredi M, Andreoli L, Bacco B, Bertero T, Bortoluzzi A, Breda S Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019; 6:11.

PMID: 30873413 PMC: 6404544. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00011.


Fetal Arrhythmias: Genetic Background and Clinical Implications.

Yuan S Pediatr Cardiol. 2018; 40(2):247-256.

PMID: 30478614 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-018-2008-3.


Immune response against the coiled coil domain of Sjögren's syndrome associated autoantigen Ro52 induces salivary gland dysfunction.

Sroka M, Bagavant H, Biswas I, Ballard A, Deshmukh U Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018; 36 Suppl 112(3):41-46.

PMID: 29465352 PMC: 6068008.


Progress in the pathogenesis and treatment of cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus.

Izmirly P, Saxena A, Buyon J Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017; 29(5):467-472.

PMID: 28520682 PMC: 5578407. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000414.

References
1.
Bergman G, Eliasson H, Bremme K, Wahren-Herlenius M, Sonesson S . Anti-Ro52/SSA antibody-exposed fetuses with prolonged atrioventricular time intervals show signs of decreased cardiac performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34(5):543-9. DOI: 10.1002/uog.7343. View

2.
Brito-Zeron P, Izmirly P, Ramos-Casals M, Buyon J, Khamashta M . The clinical spectrum of autoimmune congenital heart block. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015; 11(5):301-12. PMC: 5551504. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.29. View

3.
Julkunen H, Eronen M . The rate of recurrence of isolated congenital heart block: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44(2):487-8. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2<487::AID-ANR70>3.0.CO;2-D. View

4.
Ambrosi A, Sonesson S, Wahren-Herlenius M . Molecular mechanisms of congenital heart block. Exp Cell Res. 2014; 325(1):2-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.01.003. View

5.
Reed J, Clancy R, Lee K, Saxena A, Izmirly P, Buyon J . Umbilical cord blood levels of maternal antibodies reactive with p200 and full-length Ro 52 in the assessment of risk for cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 64(9):1373-81. PMC: 3413772. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21704. View