» Articles » PMID: 27546526

Sagittal Imbalance in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Outcomes After Simple Decompression Surgery

Overview
Journal Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Aug 23
PMID 27546526
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Context: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common lumbar degenerative disease, and sagittal imbalance is uncommon. Forward-bending posture, which is primarily caused by buckling of the ligamentum flavum, may be improved via simple decompression surgery.

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to identify the risk factors for sagittal imbalance and to describe the outcomes of simple decompression surgery.

Study Design: This is a retrospective nested case-control study PATIENT SAMPLE: This was a retrospective study that included 83 consecutive patients (M:F=46:37; mean age, 68.5±7.7 years) who underwent decompression surgery and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.

Outcome Measures: The primary end point was normalization of sagittal imbalance after decompression surgery.

Methods: Sagittal imbalance was defined as a C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥40 mm on a 36-inch-long lateral whole spine radiograph. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for sagittal imbalance. Bilateral decompression was performed via a unilateral approach with a tubular retractor. The SVA was measured on serial radiographs performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The prognostic factors for sagittal balance recovery were determined based on various clinical and radiological parameters.

Results: Sagittal imbalance was observed in 54% (45/83) of patients, and its risk factors were old age and a large mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. The 1-year normalization rate was 73% after decompression surgery, and the median time to normalization was 1 to 3 months. Patients who did not experience SVA normalization exhibited low thoracic kyphosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.10) (p<.01) and spondylolisthesis (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.61) before surgery.

Conclusions: Sagittal imbalance was observed in more than 50% of LSS patients, but this imbalance was correctable via simple decompression surgery in 70% of patients.

Citing Articles

Impact of the hip osteoarthritis on sagittal spine-pelvis alignment parameters in lumbar spinal stenosis with sagittal malalignment: a propensity score matching study.

Cheng J, Wang S, Pan F, Kong C, Lu S Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(12):4467-4475.

PMID: 39470750 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08536-8.


Change in Lumbar Lordosis After Decompressive Surgery in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients and Associations With Patient-Related Outcomes Two Years After Surgery: Radiologic and Clinical Results From the NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial.

Akerstedt J, Wanman J, Banitalebi H, Myklebust T, Weber C, Storheim K Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024; 50(1):40-45.

PMID: 38736326 PMC: 11627310. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005037.


Sagittal balance in sitting and standing positions: A systematic review of radiographic measures.

Dharnipragada R, Bostrom N, Bertogliat M, Denduluri L, Dhawan S, Ladd B Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28545.

PMID: 38590852 PMC: 10999916. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28545.


Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

Son H, Chang B, Chang S, Gimm G, Kim H Clin Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(5):800-808.

PMID: 37811507 PMC: 10551678. DOI: 10.4055/cios22362.


Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy With Bilateral Decompression Surgery in Severe Lumbar Stenosis Under Electrophysiological Monitoring-Focused on Full-Visualized Trephine/Osteotome.

Dou N, Wang H, Hu S, Huang Z, Zhong J, Li S Neurospine. 2023; 20(3):1040-1046.

PMID: 37798996 PMC: 10562220. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346624.312.