The L3 Flexion Angle Predicts Failure of Non-Operative Management in Patients with Tandem Spondylolithesis

Overview

Journal Global Spine J

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2023 Mar 7

PMID 36881755

Authors

Jonathan F Dalton

Mitchell S Fourman

Bryan Rynearson

Rick Wawrose

Landon Cluts

Jeremy D Shaw

Joon Y Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Determine impact of standard/novel spinopelvic parameters on global sagittal imbalance, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, and clinical outcomes in patients with multi-level, tandem degenerative spondylolisthesis (TDS).

Methods: Single institution analysis; 49 patients with TDS. Demographics, PROMIS and ODI scores collected. Radiographic measurements-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, sagittal L3 flexion angle (L3FA) and L3 sagittal distance (L3SD). Stepwise linear multivariate regression performed using full length cassettes to identify demographic and radiographic factors predictive of aberrant SVA (≥5 cm). Receiver operative curve (ROC) analysis used to identify cutoffs for lumbar radiographic values independently predictive of SVA ≥5 cm. Univariate comparisons of patient demographics, (HRQoL) scores and surgical indication were performed around this cutoff using two-way Student's t-tests and Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Results: Patients with increased L3FA had worse ODI (P = .006) and increased rate of failing non-operative management (P = .02). L3FA (OR 1.4, 95% CI) independently predicted of SVA ≥5 cm (sensitivity and specifity of 93% and 92%). Patients with SVA ≥5 cm had lower LL (48.7 ± 19.5 vs 63.3 ± 6.9 mm, < .021), higher L3SD (49.3 ± 12.9 vs 28.8 ± 9.2, P < .001) and L3FA (11.6 ± 7.9 vs -3.2 ± 6.1, P < .001) compared to patients with SVA ≤5 cm.

Conclusions: Increased flexion of L3, which is easily measured by the novel lumbar parameter L3FA, predicts global sagittal imbalance in TDS patients. Increased L3FA is associated with worse performance on ODI, and failure of non-operative management in patients with TDS.

Citing Articles

Association between anthropometric measurements of chairs and biomechanical variables leading to musculoskeletal problems in students at different government universities of Multan.

Irfan M, Qurat-Ul-Ain , Iqbal M, Chen J, Khan M, Sattar M Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(10):6136-6147.

PMID: 37969200 PMC: 10641341.

References

Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J . Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(3):346-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65. View

Zou L, Liu J, Lu H . Characteristics and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2018; 42(3):671-682. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-1004-7. View

Stephens G, Yoo J, Wilbur G . Comparison of lumbar sagittal alignment produced by different operative positions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(15):1802-6; discussion 1807. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199608010-00016. View

Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Morizono Y, Masuda A, Demirtas A . Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(11):1204-10. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199011010-00021. View

Angevine P, Kaiser M . Radiographic measurement techniques. Neurosurgery. 2008; 63(3 Suppl):40-5. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000320425.55569.21. View

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

Park D, An H, Lurie J, Zhao W, Tosteson A, Tosteson T . Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(4):439-46. PMC: 2886146. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdafb9. View

FitzGerald J, NEWMAN P . Degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976; 58(2):184-92. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.58B2.932080. View

Ferrero E, Simon A, Magrino B, Ould-Slimane M, Guigui P . Double-level degenerative spondylolisthesis: what is different in the sagittal plane?. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(8):2546-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4384-9. View

10.

Chung N, Jeon C, Lee H, Won S . Measurement of Spinopelvic Parameters on Standing Lateral Lumbar Radiographs: Validity and Reliability. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 30(2):E119-E123. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000448. View

11.

Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco J . Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:609-18. PMC: 3175914. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x. View

12.

Vedantam R, Lenke L, Keeney J, Bridwell K . Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(2):211-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00012. View

13.

Godde S, Fritsch E, Dienst M, Kohn D . Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(15):1693-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083167.78853.D5. View

14.

Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Berthonnaud E, Hresko T, OBrien M . Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(9):1170-6. PMC: 2527424. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0713-y. View

15.

Parks R, Menger R, Zhang A, Sin A . Value Proposition to a Hospital of Obtaining 36-inch Standing Scoliosis Film Technology. Cureus. 2018; 10(7):e3044. PMC: 6153096. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3044. View

16.

Le Huec J, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S . Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2014; 39(1):87-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6. View

17.

Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P . Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(9):1459-67. PMC: 2200735. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6. View

18.

Sinharay S, Stern H, Russell D . The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychol Methods. 2002; 6(4):317-29. View

19.

Tribus C, Belanger T, Zdeblick T . The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(1):58-61. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199901010-00014. View

20.

Morel E, Ilharreborde B, Lenoir T, Hoffmann E, Vialle R, Rillardon L . [Sagittal balance of the spine and degenerative spondylolisthesis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2005; 91(7):615-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(05)84465-4. View